Wednesday, July 24, 2013

A portrait in Tyrol


Above images - top: the cover of the book "Geschichte der Kirche in Tirol" by Josef Gelmi, publishing house Athesia. Below: at page 364 there's the image of a picture in a Tyrolean church. Caption: "Three Roman soldiers playing dice [to get] the dress of Christ, the heads of the soldiers are carrying portraits. The central figure is to be identified as prince chancellor of the reign Otto von Bismarck. Picture in the church of the Vinzentinums at Brixen (an excerpt) by painter A. Steiner von Felsburg."

"....Stoecker continued to draw significant crowds because of his Christian Social Gospel and Jewish Question sermons and speeches, remaining an influential figure both in the socialist movement and the growing anti-Semitic movement. Stoecker died on February 2, 1909 in Bozen Gries (German pronunciation: [ˈboːtsən griːəs]), South Tyrol, Austria-Hungary.....".


Tuesday, April 5, 2011

1862: a trip in Vatican

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Lybian war used to put enmity between Turkey, Germany and Austria?


Antonino Paternò Castello, marchese di San Giuliano:

Above image -  ".....Antonino Paternò-Castello, sixth Marquis di San Giuliano (known as Antonino di San Giuliano, Catania, December 10, 1852 - Rome, 16 October 1914) was an Italian politician and diplomat.

After being Postmaster General in 1899, 1905-1906 and 1910-1914 he was Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of Italy.

Liberal and anticlerical, in 1906 he directed the Italian politics to the Conference of Algeciras giving it autonomy from all'alleata Germany. Later he was sent as ambassador to London and Paris (1906-1910).

Started his second term for Foreign Affairs (1910), followed by Italy, which exploited the Agadir Crisis to begin the conflict with Turkey. After early successes of the Italian army in Libya he was unable to make a simple protectorate for the decision of the Prime Minister Giovanni Giolitti to implement a complete conquest and annexation. Prolungatosi therefore the conflict, handled the difficult position of Italy towards Europe.

He led the negotiations for the renewal of the Triple Alliance of 1912 and managed the development of the Balkan wars in Italy, with particular attention to Albania of which supported the strategic importance for the control of the Adriatic.

Although proponent of the Triple Alliance, the outbreak of World War I began negotiations approaching the Triple Entente. These contacts lead then, with his successors at Foreign Affairs , to the signing of the Treaty of London and the subsequent descent into the war against Austria in 1915.

After the ultimatum of 28 September 1911 and the landing of troops on the Italian coast of Libya, with the passing of weeks, thanks to German mediation, San Giuliano showed himself willing to negotiations that would have formally left Libya to Turkey, and that they would be granted to 'Italy a protectorate of political-economic [30]. For an alternative view was that instead Giolitti claim full employment of the territory in order to establish any form of domination had wanted to Italy. [31]Forced to revise its plans in terms of annexation and extension of the conflict, the Marquis found himself in trouble with the Allies, who were very close to Turkey: Germany didn't guarantee its mediation in Constantinople [32] and the 'Italy Austria forced not to take action against targets Turkish Italian ships in the Adriatic and Ionian Seas. [33] In France, mounted the protests, which resulted in a diplomatic crisis with Italy January 22, 1912, following a speech to the House of President Poincare [34].The interpretation of Article 7With Austria then began a long and delicate negotiations for the Turkish occupation of the islands of the Aegean, coveted by Italy as a basis to stop the flow of supplies to the Turkish Libyan ports. The Austrian Foreign Minister Alois Lexa von Aehrenthal opposed to such employment by invoking Article 7 of the Triple Alliance, which obliged the power (in Italy or Austria), which expanded in the Balkans and the Aegean to agree with each other to lavish upon her remuneration from [35].Taking advantage of the ongoing negotiations for the renewal of the covenant, San Giuliano parried by the Vienna common understanding ally, Berlin, that the occupations in the Aegean were essential to end the war in Libya, remaining which would have ended the Triple Alliance because Italy would not have renewed it. [36]Meanwhile, the Austrian Foreign Minister Aehrenthal has been succeeded by Leopold Berchtold who was  malleable and, influenced by Germany, on April 6, 1912 showed an opening respect Italy, and 26, the [Italian]  Navy was able to proceed with the landing operations on the first island to be conquered: Stampalia..........".

Wikipedia - URL:,_marchese_di_San_Giuliano

    Plese note the above coincidences of the days and of the nations: both Germany and Italy attacked Yugoslavia without declaration of war in 1941, on 6th April.

Count Leopold Berchtold:


   Above image - "...Leopold (Anton Johann Sigismund Josef Korsinus Ferdinand) Graf Berchtold von und zu Ungarschitz, Frättling und Püllütz (Hungarian: Gróf Berchtold Lipót, Czech: Leopold hrabě Berchtold z Uherčic) (18 April 1863 – 21 November 1942), was an Austro-Hungarian[1] politician, diplomat and statesman who served as Imperial Foreign Minister at the outbreak of World War I.
        .........At the outset of the Balkan Wars, Count Berchtold pursued a hard-line policy and flirted with the idea of war against Serbia, but vacillated and pulled back from intervention at the last moment.[7] Although he managed to prevent Serbia from securing an outlet to the Adriatic Sea with the creation of Albania, the Balkan Wars resulted in a failure to contain the rising Russian influence in the Balkans and thwart Serbian ambitions for a South Slav state.[8] It meant diplomatic defeat for Austria-Hungary and also a reputation of being weak and indecisive for Count Berchtold
        After having dispatched Count Hoyos on a mission to Berlin on 5 July to secure German support for Austria-Hungary's future actions, which resulted in the famous ' blank cheque ', he became the leading spokesman, together with the Chief of the General Staff General Conrad von Hötzendorf, for war against Serbia during the meeting of the imperial Crown Council on 7 July.
        However, Italian Foreign Minister Baron Sonnino succeeded in obtaining vague promises of compensations in South Tyrol from Germany and by the end of 1914, Count Berchtold informed the Crown Council that the choice was either acceptance of the Italian demands or a declaration of war. Both Count Tisza and General Conrad von Hötzendorf expressed a preference for the latter.[16] Under mounting German pressure, Count Berchtold, however, indicated that he was ready to cede the Trentino and parts of the Albanian coastline. When he informed Count Tisza and General Conrad von Hötzendorf of the concessions he was ready to give, they forced him to resign on 13 January 1915.[17] At Count Tisza’s insistence he was replaced by the more pugnacious Count Burián......"
        Wikipedia - URL:

Friday, June 28, 2013

28 JUNE 1914 - Berlin-Baghdad Railway is dead.

Friday, June 28, 2013

28 JUNE 1914 - Berlin-Baghdad Railway is dead.


I cannot do a post as usual. The Swines don’t allow to me to access to the addresses necessary to write this article. What did I have intention to do?


Well, the article you could read and will never read would be opened by a video, a short video of my little railroad layout. [If you want to see it please go to the address: 
title: “Museumszug in Nowhereland – I”].

This would be intro, I am railroad modeller fanatic, especially German Austrian of age from I to early III. The train would have introduced the argument especially because is a steam train, with passengers cars of early XX century in the administration of early twenties. The steam loco is a Prussian one used to push heavy trains on mountains lines, lines like the ones through the…..: BALKANS.

Then I would have putted the picture of the assassinated archduke ranz Ferdinand of Austria, he was in fact assassinated in the BALKANS, precisely Sarajevo.

Then I would have presented the core of the article, the Wikipedia page on the causes of the First World Conflict, the….:

Berlin-Baghdad Railway

I would have explained how the usual historical explanations are tricks to avoid the true cause of the first conflict. This project of railway would have signed for ever the unity of the Catholic Austria with Protestant Prussia, with a predominance of Protestant Prussia. It would have signed the definitive denial by the Hapsburgs to the orders of the Jesuits and Vatican to fight to death the Northern ‘heretics’, the German cousins of Berlin. Super-Catholics Hapsburg would have said the farewell to the dream of Counter Reformation of the Jesuits as the perspective of a joining of forces of both German opposite worlds in the Balkans would have gained more profits and development for both Austria and Prussia than a fratricidal war in the name of the “principles of the papacy”. Then they would joined the Ottoman empire carrying there dangerous liberal ‘infection’.

I then would have ended repeating what I just told. Hapsburg, being a Catholic dynasty, had the right to interfere  with the elections of the popes in Vatican and this is “anathema” for the papal infallibility ordered by the evil Jesuits. I would have remarked that this is one of the principal causes of the disappearing of the Catholic dynasties, to avoid secular ingerences in Vatican which would have kicked the Jesuits.

Then I would have remarked what just told year ago, that Hapsburg being successor of the emperors, enjoyed a greater privilege on the papacy than the usual one enjoyed by usual Catholic dynasties. They had the RIGHT OF IMPRIMATUR to every new pope, just see the Barbarossa’s etc. history.

Therefore that railroad represented the end of the Vatican and of the Jesuits, therefore they had to gather the opposite economical interests in the world in order to create a war based on economical presumptions but with a religious goal.

I would have ended the article with the second video “Museumszug in Nowhereland – II” at URL:

Thursday, April 11, 2013

"Jewish Question" and National-Socialism as Big Jesuit Scheme born in XVII century?


 ".....Greatly influenced by the Jesuits, he [Leopold I, holy Roman emperor] was a staunch proponent of the Counter-reformation.......".

*   *   *




    After an exchange of thoughts with nwo-truthresearch blog author, I reflected on the matter and did some research, some ideas of mine seem to be perfectly confirmed - Leopold I (un)holy emperor, the Jesuits and the "Jewish Question" here:

From: Leopold I, Holy Roman Emperor  
 by Wikipedia 

Leopold I (name in full: Leopold Ignaz Joseph Balthasar Felician; Hungarian: I. Lipót; 9 June 1640 – 5 May 1705) was Holy Roman Emperor, King of Hungary and King of Bohemia.
The second son of Ferdinand III, Holy Roman Emperor by his first wife, Maria Anna of Spain, Leopold became heir apparent in 1654 by the death of his elder brother Ferdinand IV. Elected Holy Roman Emperor in 1658, Leopold would rule as such until his death in 1705.
Originally intended for the Church, Leopold had received a suitably ecclesiastical education. But Fate put in motion a different plan for him when smallpox took his elder brother Ferdinand on 9 July 1654 and made Leopold heir apparent.[2] Nonetheless, Leopold's church education had clearly marked him. Leopold remained influenced by the Jesuits and his education throughout his life, and was uncommonly knowledgeable for a monarch about theology, metaphysics, jurisprudence and the sciences. He also retained his interest in astrology and alchemy which he had developed under Jesuit tutors.[2] A deeply religious and devoted person, Leopold personified the pietas Austriaca, or the loyally Catholic attitude of his House. On the other hand, his piety and education may have caused in him a fatalistic strain which inclined him to reject all compromise on denominational questions, not always a positive characteristic in a ruler.
In 1690, Transylvania put a veto against a constitutional amendment, attempted by Leopold, about some religious questions.[11] In 1692, Peter the Great became a little bit sorry that he only met Jesuits at the court in Vienna, when he visited Leopold.[12] In 1692, Prince Michael of Transylvania was called to Vienna, because of a dispute over his recent marriage.
Leopold was a man of industry and education, and during his later years, he showed some political ability. Regarding himself as an absolute sovereign, he was extremely tenacious of his rights. Greatly influenced by the Jesuits, he was a staunch proponent of the Counter-reformation. In person, he was short, but strong and healthy. Although he had no inclination for a military life, he loved exercise in the open air, such as hunting and riding; he also had a taste for music and composed several Oratorios and Suites of Dances.
 "..........The reestablishment of the Jewish community in 1671

Today's Jewish community dates back to 1671, when several Jewish families came to Berlin. They were expelled in 1670 by Leopold I in Vienna. Since Brandenburg daniederlag after the Thirty Years War, the Great Elector Friedrich Wilhelm sought to immigrants into the country to contribute to its reconstruction. In addition to the Huguenots, who came into the country from 1685, however, he allowed her to much worse conditions on 21 May 1671 also 50 wealthy Jewish families to settle in Brandenburg. The privilege of Frederick William to allow the Jews to settle in the whole marrow and assigned them to the field of trade, the guilds of them remained locked. Besides the usual taxes every Jewish family had to pay an annual nominal fee. Only one child per family was allowed to settle in the marrow; to get a marriage license, had an extra fee to be paid. The nascent Jewish communities were allowed to hire a teacher and a kosher butcher and create a cemetery, but the construction of synagogues was temporarily banned.


    Well, so we have the Great Elector Friederich Wilhelm welcoming the Jews expelled by the Jesuit controlled Leopold I in Vienna. But there's no festival for the Jews coming from Vienna. Yes, they can at least breathe in Berlin and Protestant Prussia, but are subject to heavy boundaries and limitation.


     But it is just in the answer of that "why?" that you can discover the Jesuit perfidy. Great Elector Friederich was forced to limit the liberties of immigrated Jews just to not touch the delicate balance between Lutherans and Calvinists. Just only seven years before he issued the Edict of Tolerance [or else named Edict of Brandenburg] and the Jesuits' answer didn't wait too long: the expulsion of Jews. Do I need to recall to you the Edict of Tolerance? [To be not confused with Edict of Potsdam, which was the answer to the Jesuit persecutions against Huguenots in France issued in 1685]:

"........The Brandenburg Edict was issued in 1664 by Elector Friedrich Wilhelm I and governed relations between the Lutheran and Reformed denominations in the country from the Lords.

     The edict forbade the Lutherans and the Reformed (Calvinist) in
particular theologians, to practice their, public criticism to the teachings of each other faiths from the pulpit .
     The Confessions of the Evangelical Lutheran Church were restricted in their validity concerning the demarcations with the Calvinist doctrine. Effectively so that the validity of the Formula of Concord was lifted.

The edict of the Reformed elector saw a part of the Lutheran theologians at a disadvantage of his own party and made bitter opposition.

 Decisive here is the program of the Heidelberg Reformed David Pareus  with the aim of create a bridge over religious antagonisms between Reformed and Lutherans, to create a common front against the Catholic Church.
....." [in the link below the source and my report of it]

      Well, with fatigue the Great Elector could create a common anti-Roman Catholic front between Lutherans and Calvinists. But for Rome the front had to be destroyed. How to do that? Simple, the Jesuits used the Jews and with this they definitively established the "Jewish Question" and the basis for the centuries later incoming ecumenical ideology named "National Socialism". 

      Jesuits used their Leopold I, probably also mind controlled by the Society of "Jesus". They put in motion their Big Scheme who would have then, after centuries, destroyed Protestant Prussia (formally in 1918, definitively in 1945). They chose to make pressure on the anti-Jewish Achille's heel of the Lutherans. Jewish immigration would have fired the historical religious Lutheran antisemitism and imbued it with new (satanic) life. Calvinism doesn't share the Lutheran super-sessionism, the theological doctrine for which Jews lost the Covenant after Jesus' death on the cross. The more open attitude of the Calvinists towards Jewish immigration would have resuscitated again the Lutheran hostility towards the Protestant brothers, especially after they saw that those Jews coming from Austria were well educated and largely instructed, therefore able to increase the value of the properties of the ones collaborating with them. Of course the natural and religious choice "with whom to collaborate" of the  Jewish refugee from Jesuitical Vienna, was entirely directed to the Calvinist front, cause the conscience about the historical Lutheran anti-Judaism

     Therefore the premises for a new destructive war inside the Protestant front of the most powerful continental enemy of Rome, Protestant Prussia, were all created with that immigration. Leopold I didn't expel Jews "just for a theological hobby", but because he obeyed to the influence of his masterminds, the Jesuits, who cynically used the People of God for their criminal purposes of persecution of both Jews as well of the Christians who refuse to submit to the Antichrist in Rome, the pope!


Thursday, September 6, 2012

The author of 1662 and 1664 EDICT OF TOLERANCE among the ancestors of Ulrich von Hassell

Wednesday, July 25, 2012

140 years after: Continuing Jesuitical Großdeutsche Lösung?

Thursday, March 28, 2013

Mussolini's Jesuitical revenge?


Above image - the general of SJ Pietro Tacchi-Venturi, SJ Wladimir Ledochowsky.

Above image - SJ Pietro Tacchi-Venturi, the Jesuit controller of Mussolini

Above image - Jesuitical Mussolini signing the restoring of Vatican as full Temporal Power.

Mario Tedeschi (Rome, September 9, 1924 - Rome, November 8, 1993) was an Italian journalist and politician.

Above image - Mario Tedeschi, the son of a Fascist of Jewish origin engineer murdered in Africa colonies

He succeeded Leo Longanesi to the direction of the magazine Il Borghese after the death of its founder. He led the magazine in what was perhaps the most successful period editorial. His father, fascist  of Jewish origin and construction engineer at the IACP, after the signing of the Lateran Treaty (1929), tore up the card party, and as punishment he was transferred to the colonies of East Africa to direct the construction of roads. There he died when the yard, defenseless, was attacked by enemy gangs and all Italians were killed......."


     Mario Tedeschi was the director of the post-war Italian radical right wing/Fascist and pro-monarchic publishing house/magazine "Il Borghese" which published the work of Nino lo Bello "The Vatican empire"/"L'Oro del Vaticano":

 Monday, March 25, 2013

Nino Lo Bello's "L'Oro del Vaticano" ["The Gold of the Vatican"]

From page 66 of Nino Lo Bello's The Vatican Empire, in Italian at page 72  in L'Oro del Vaticano (note the finesse of the page number coinciding with the fatidical year for the Jesuits' company, 1872):

".....When the news of the Church-State treaty was finally announced, the local citizenry—as well as the rest of the world—was startled. The Italian public, clearly pleased, accorded Benito Mussolini an overflow of support, which he himself had not perhaps anticipated. He became an idol to Catholic Italy. In thousands of homes, people cut pictures of the Duce from magazines and newspapers and pasted them on kitchen and living room walls. Youths splashed pro-Duce slogans in white paint on any flat surface available. Shovels he had used to inaugurate public projects were prized as relics. Wine glasses from which he had sipped were lovingly placed on shelves by restaurant owners. Young women by the thousands offered their favors to his virility—and let it be said that many of them, in fact, were ushered into the Duce's chambers.
     But if the Lateran Treaty was a major coup for Mussolini, it was to be an even bigger victory for the Vatican. Mussolini, like all his bloodstained predecessors, has gone the way of all flesh, but the Vatican remains. And today the Vatican is solidly entrenched in the
Italian economy

  ".... the increase of the 400 millions of men, who in all the corners of the Earth are looking at Rome, is of interest and a proud even for us who are Italians....”[by Benito Mussolini]

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

" of interest and a proud even for us who are Italians".

".....David Kertzer, in his book The Popes Against the Jews [8] (2001), accuses the Catholic Church have argued, with its anti-Judaism, anti-Semitism of the twentieth century totalitarianism. In particular, reports that in 1882 the "La Civiltà Cattolica" announced with satisfaction the first manifestations of modern anti-Semitic political movements that organized international conferences. Also shows that in 1890 appeared in the same journal three long articles on "Jewish question" in the following years were combined into a 90-page booklet distributed to every where....."

 Tuesday, April 5, 2011

1862: a trip in Vatican

[PS: of course all those Catholic Roman enthusiasm for the Duce after the signature of the Lateran Treaty disappeared few years later, when Mussolini was induced to believe he got charte blanche from the Vatican and in exchange for having restored the Temporal bulwark of the popes he could suppress the Catholic Action because too much riotous respect the directives of the party. But we can consider also this move of Mussolini already existing in the minds of the Jesuits, as the times were  mature to build the inner silent Catholic opposition to the regime, an opposition who would put at work in the scheme of sabotaging the Axis war in Eurasia, and where the best examples were the Russian front and the Yugoslavia. Don't worry if was SJ Sale to 'discover' that already in 1942 elements of the Savoy family plotted to make a quick 'end' to the war [= to change alliance and betray the Nazi-Germany]. But they too have been betrayed by the Vatican and the Jesuits, as Rome needed not of a simple 'defeat' of Germany, but of the total, complete annihilation of the last rests of Protestant Prussia, plus some others religious definitions become famous with the WWII...].

Saturday, March 9, 2013

Monday, January 28, 2013

Berlusconi confirms the role of Fascist Italy ["apparently ally - secretely enemy"]


 "....Was this perhaps something that Wlodimir Ledochowski admitted to his assassin[s] directly shortly before his death?..." [Douglas Willinger - see References]


"...Berlusconi defends Mussolini at Holocaust event

Italy's former prime minister, who is campaigning to return to politics, also defends the fascist dictator's decision to ally with Adolf Hitler. 


Obviously the government of that time, out of fear that German power might lead to complete victory, preferred to ally itself with Hitler's Germany rather than opposing it," he said. "As part of this alliance, there were impositions, including combating and exterminating Jews. The racial laws were the worst fault of Mussolini as a leader, who in so many other ways did well.........."


   But now it is necessary to recall a secondary information about Silvio Berlusconi:

".....According to experts, in fact, is the garden of Villa Certosa that the mausoleum built by the President of the Council in Arcore inspired by Masonic and esoteric symbolism. There is in fact a tomb designed by Pietro Cascella, with a sarcophagus for Berlusconi and a "dormitory" for another thirty people within the famous estate in Brianza. But it is not a family chapel, but a burial place for him and his closest associates, just as required by the rules of a cult. Consists of 12 columns at the top stand cubes, spheres and pyramids, and then again compasses and squares, traditional Masonic symbols. Among these, we also recognizes a swastika, which in paganism holds multiple meanings......".

From: "Those Masonic symbols Arcore and Villa Certosa
Circles and dolmens in the garden of Villa Certosa and a mausoleum for the burial of the adepts at Villa San Martino
" - Catherine Perniconi | September 28, 2010, Il Fatto Quotidiano.


Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Twelve beams = The Twelve Ideals?

"....the sun wheel, the Most High!......."

Wednesday, July 25, 2012

140 years after: Continuing Jesuitical Großdeutsche Lösung?

"....The garden [of Berlusconi's mausoleum], for example, seen from above has a square plan inspired on, iconography, is attributed to Solomon's Temple in Jerusalem,...."

Above two images of Berlusconi's swastika - from URL:

    At least Constantine order knight and worshiper of Madonna/Queen of Europe Silvio Berlusconi told a bit of the truth. Fascism was created 1) to restore the temporal power of the Vatican and 2) as a false ally of the Germany, to induce it in a war and then to betray it at the right moment, after the Jesuit-Nazi machine to purge from Eurasia the greatest number of Jews, Orthodoxies, liberal Catholics etc. was put in motion and impossible to stop. After having done the dirty job, from the killer,  Nazi-Germany it would have been  purged the historical Protestantism and particularly Eastern Prussia, the first Protestant state in the world.

    [And you can also see here and there in my The Vatican Crusade in the Balkans the evidences of the hopes of Vatican Fascist-Savoy Italy for a reversing of the fronts, an alliance with London to grab as much possible at the expenses of Germany, but the final goal, the Big Scheme - religious purge in Eurasia - was kept hidden from Mussolini & C. [because in order to be realized it implied a total catastrophe] who, at the end of the game, went too cheated by Vatican and Jesuit order. They definitively deserved it. Probably from here it descends the timing of the Ledochowsky's death [see References: D. Willinger's "Wlodimir Ledochowski's Various N.Y.Times Obituaries"] and the opinion of Alberto Romero Rivera about the alliance Vatican-Germany, as it is not far from the reality to imagine that a consistent number of the same Jesuits were induced to believe that the Roman Catholic consuls Hitler and Himmler would have been able to induce Protestants to 'convert' or to definitively abandon their enmity to the pope in a hypothetical victorious after-war scenario] - see also:

"......The head of the government (Mussolini) said to Pietro Tacchi Venturi in a private talk (Thursday 7th April 1938) that, in front of Hitler, it would be convenient to be more forcible, without ambiguity; not now, immediately, but waiting the most opportune moment, in order to adopt these more strong measures, for example the excommunication,...[]....."

From: Sunday, November 30, 2008 - Burn,... burn,…. old Prussian heritage….(part two) 

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

" of interest and a proud even for us who are Italians".

 Thursday, October 22, 2009

The three "I" of "Instigate, Identify and Inquisition"


 "......I have seen internet speculation that he was poisoned.
If he was poisoned, that timing may suggest the culprit[s] being pro-3rd Reich Jesuits who wanted Germany to win, upon finding that Wlodimir Ledochowski had raised up the 3rd Reich to lose.
Was this perhaps something that Wlodimir Ledochowski admitted to his assassin[s] directly shortly before his death?......"
 [by Douglas Willinger].

Sunday, June 10, 2007

Wlodimir (Vladimir) Ledochowski's Death Timing


 "......BERNE, Switzerland, Dec. 13- The Very Rev. Vladimir Ledochowski, "Black Pope" and Superior General of the Society of Jesus, died in his cell in Borgo Santo Spirito, headquarters of the orer in Rome, tonigt a few minutes after 6 o'clcok. His age was 76. Father Ledochowski underwent an abdominal operation five weeks ago. It was erroneously reported in a Rome broadcast that he had died Wednesday night....[]....."

Monday, May 16, 2011

Wlodimir Ledochowski's Various N.Y.Times Obituaries