A conspiracy developed between England, France and Russia, who were afraid of Germany's rise to power.
There was no other reason, that any historian can give, of why these three countries decided to try and wipe Germany off the map.........."
Continuing to put the blame on the "Zionist/Jewish" plot as regard the bloodiest event in history.
Never mention the figure of Wladimir/Wlodimir Ledochowsky, the Jesuit order. And the destruction of every serious religious competitor to Rome in Eurasia i.e. Judaism, Protestantism especially Lutheran, Orthodox 'heretic' churches.
Continuing to focus the attention on the means (apparently "Jewish") in order to divert it from the goals (concretely Counter Reformation of Jesuit order) to be achieved with such means.
Always present the Zionist/Jewish actors on the scene as "genuine" and never arise the suspect that his Judaic masque can hide a gentile Romish agenda.
I took knowledge of the site from the blog nwo-truthresearch which translated in Italian the page related to the "three cities" ruling the world:
But truly there's only a city ruling the world, the imperial palace of the universal emperor of Rome (the pope), namely: the city of the Vatican, to which the city of London and Washington DC are submitted. Vatican is briefly quoted just only to push away the sensation to read a truly anti-Judaic and anti-Protestant source of 'alternative' information? But of this you can have confirm with your eyes, just read another excerpt of the previously quoted page:
At this time, USA was completely pro-German.
- The Newspapers where controlled by German-Jews
- The Banking Industry was controlled by German-Jews
- The Media and Communications were controlled by German-Jews
- List list goes on..
However.. the bankers did not want Russia to win this war. So banking interests, Khun, Loeb & Co. etc. refused to finance France and England because of their Russian Ties. They had poured money into Germany with the aim of destabilizing the Tsars of the Russian regime......."
Despite the Vatican is considered one of the three city ruling the world, no mention of it (of the Jesuit order or of the Counter Reformation, of the Protestant Prussia, of Lenin travelling in Russia in a Vatican sealed railroad wagon, of the coming back of Jesuit order in Russia in 1922, of SJ Edmund Walsh, etc., etc.), in the page about the World wars.
Again you can see how the tools and the means are substituting in the perception of the reader the true goals to be pursued with such means, the Continuing Counter Reformation via the Thirty Years War (1914 - 1945).
With the end of the first world conflict Rome erased from the face of earth four kind of dangerous secular competitors in the arena. Four empires which represented a secular, autonomous vision of the universalism (in Greek: "catholicism"), opposite to the Universalism of Rome or: opposite to the Roman Catholicism. Just only see how the s.c. system of three emperors (Hohenzollern, Hapsburg, Romanov), was dangerously keeping the perfidious Rome outside the political/religious scenario of Eurasia and particularly outside the Balkans! I just exposed that in this blog, and I just am at the beginning of it, as the material on it is very abundant.
As regard the "city" of Washington DC, see how she is only a tool of the Vatican palaces, to convince yourself give a look to the excellent blog of Douglas Willinger (follow the link in this page):
Thursday, July 14, 2011
Up Front [& Hidden In Plain Sight]The Absolute Monarchy of the Continuing Roman Empirehttp://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/10/books/review/up-front-bill-keller.html
Up Front: Bill Keller
By THE EDITORS
Published: July 7, 2011
Through the years, The New York Times’s coverage of the Roman Catholic Church and the Vatican has received sharp criticism from practicing Catholics — including the past eight years that Bill Keller has been the paper’s executive editor. Yet Keller, who wrote this week’s cover review of “Absolute Monarchs: A History of the Papacy,” by John Julius Norwich, was raised within the fold.
“My parents took their faith very seriously — especially my mother, who had the fervor of a convert (from Episcopalian),” Keller recalled in an e-mail. “My brothers and I had nuns and priests as our teachers through high school, and I look back on that education with real gratitude. I’m now what my friend Dan Barry calls a ‘collapsed Catholic’ — beyond lapsed — but you never really extricate yourself from your upbringing.”
Keller, as most readers probably know, recently announced he would step down from his current position in September, though he will continue to write a regular column (it now appears in The Times Magazine). Has he observed any parallels between the institution he has led since 2003 and the one he writes about in his review?
“I run into readers who believe The Times is a place directed from on high,” Keller replied. “The truth is that our priesthood of journalists operates with great autonomy, and our congregation of readers makes up its own mind — all as it should be. In the unlikely event that the pope ever invited me for tea, we’d probably have stories to swap about the practical limits of authority. ‘Absolute monarchs’ indeed!”
Indeed! What about the political dynamics of this following story?!
(As I have no time, no resources, no money, no support at disposition, it is clear that what I wrote is affected by many errors and uncorrectness. I am not a prostitute lay journalist of this dirty Vatican 'tollerant' regime called 'democracy'. I have not the 51% of the Bank of America supporting my writings. I don't control the Casinò of Ostenda and neither Citroen and Peugeot as the General Superior did at least in 1958. So corrections and additions could appear in the future)