A man shot four times when the pope is in Erfurt. The police sources affirms that he shot to the security men of a security company. Significantly the following video at the address, which speaks about the event is disturbed, practically a continue "go and stop":
Schüsse vor der Papstmesse
Kurz bevor der Papst eine heilige Messe mit Gläubigen in Erfurt feiern wollte, ist es zu einem Zwischenfall mit einer Schußwaffe gekommen. Ein Mann feuerte viermal auf Mitarbeiter eines Sicherheitsunternehmens.
I tried the following one to test if there is a general problem, but the video about the space debris of the NASA satellite is perfect and absolutely not disturbed:
Nasa erwartet Satelliten-Absturz auf die Erde
Ein ausrangierte Forschungssatellit der Nasa soll auf die Erde stürzen. Die Nasa gibt jedoch Entwarnung. Die Gefahr für Menschen sei "extrem gering".
Then I came back to the previous video about the shooting during the pope's visit, and it was still disturbed. Then I tried again the video on the satellite of NASA: this time it was disturbed only the initial advertisement, but the sequent news service on the space debris was still perfect. I continued to switch between both videos, and effectively the video on the shooting during pope's visit was always disturbed, discouraging the eventual spectator, meanwhile the video on the NASA satellite was always OK!
PC and the web are the perfect environment to implement the censorship making it appear a "casual defect" or a "casual problem". But statistically this is only pure censorship, elsewhere the Quantum Mechanic theoretic physics should start to study the phenomena where a person exposing in Internet the church of Rome as responsible of the first and second world war, encounters always difficulties.
Which is the Quantum equation describing the statistical coincidence of such events? Erfurt is an important center for the Reformation, and the there visit of the pope is an open provocation. Could it be that someone really was hit on the nerves by the Beast of Rome? Let's see the religious history of Erfurt:
The Thuringian states were in the 16 Century one of the first Protestant areas in the world, as the reformer Martin Luther in the Elector Frederick of Saxony had a sponsor. In addition, the background of the Reformation played partly from Thuringia, Luther completed his theology studies at the University of Erfurt, his family even came from Mohra, the Bible translation was created in part on the Wartburg and the Peasants' War and the Schmalkaldic war as reformation effects contributed to larger parts in Thuringia. Even the Reformation Anabaptist movement was widespread in large parts of Thuringia. One of the centers of the central German Baptist was the city of Mulhouse, where 1525 had already acted Thomas Munzer  .
The Protestant Church however had then never the same social influence, as it had the Catholic Church in her areas. So most of the Thuringian states were already in the 18th Century liberal and enlightened thanks primarily to the Duke of Weimar family.
The German Christians caused the disintegration of the former Lutheran state church, the atheistic world view of the SED, the appropriate education in schools and career disadvantages for Christians contributed later to the fact that the majority of the population left the church, and today the proportion of Protestant Lutheran Christians in the total population is about one quarter. In Thuringia the Evangelical Church is part of the Protestant Church formed in 2009 in central Germany, which essentially comprises the states of Thuringia and Saxony-Anhalt. The former district Schmalkalden is the only country not part of the range of EKMD, but part of the Protestant Church of Kurhessen-Waldeck.
The visit of the emperor of Rome in Erfurt is therefore an open Jesuit provocation. Only on the surface I take note of that Jesuit-Nazi German Christians church which divided the Protestant front in the Hitler's Germany in order to favor the Roman Catholic predominance in the society. Rome staged a phoney war with Hitler, and no other actor should have stolen her role of (fake) victim on the stage of the Third Reich (Jesuits built purposely also for this goal). For this reason the Protestants had to be divided in fractions. Then you have the after war Communist punishment of Rome, which didn't of course convert to Roman Catholicism the Protestants of East Germany. It simply de-Christianized the protestants (= destroyed the Protestantism), preparing them to welcome the second phase, the Romanization. The 'atheism' spread in East Germany was only the freezer where the frozen the Germans, waiting the future where Rome would have cooked 'em in the Romish pot (to ate 'em as Roman Catholic food).
Above image - the pope in the land of the Mother of all Peasants' wars - URL: http://www.welt.de/politik/specials/papst/article13616282/Papst-Benedikt-XVI-und-die-Schuesse-in-Erfurt.html
But it is from the past of five centuries ago that comes the most important allusions of doc Ratzinger's visit.
Note the historical importance of Thuringia. First for the Anabaptist movement, which was righteously seen by Luther as a keen way - when in the hands of Rome - to weak – using a modern definition as it would be used today – his 'left' side, in other words with a direct competition aimed to give a powerful hit to one of the pillars of the Luther's theology, dragging away from his influence a discrete number of Roman Catholic priests who just were with the heart just on the side of Martin Luther Reform. Another attempt to destroy the Reform, even more dangerous, was the uprising of the peasants asking for secular reforms in front of the secular and religious power. At the beginning Martin Luther wanted to play a role of intermediary between the nobility and the peasants, agreeing with some requests coming from the protesters. This demonstrates the good intentions of Luther which the Roman Catholic perfidious propaganda continues to describe as a man filled with the "thirsty of blood":
With the 12 articles the rebels gave themselves to common objectives, ranging from the mere restoration of their customary rights to the abolition of serfdom reaching also democratic rights. They referred it to the "divine right" and to the Luther's principle sola scriptura. Like him, they agreed to drop their claims as soon as they prove them wrong from the Bible. This religiously based their earlier hopes for social liberation was first punch.
Luther distanced himself from the 12 items because of their mistaken in his view, citing the Bible. In April 1525 he tried in a pamphlet, however, an amicable agreement and a balanced judgment, accepted some legitimate claims of the farmers, and reprimanded both them and the Princes deal.
Of course Luther wanted to conserve both the support of the peasants and the one of the nobility. And, of course, he was – not strange fact in the XVI century – more inclined towards the nobility than to the peasants. But in any case he never started to preach the blood bath against the peasants. So when and especially why does it happen?
But after some farmers an earl and his companions were murdered (Weinsberger murder), Luther wrote his treatise Against the murderous hordes of peasants. In it he condemned the riots as the work of the devil now and called all the princes - regardless of their religion - in this, the farmers with all necessary force to crush. Then reinforced the princes, in which Luther's word had weight, their counterpart army.
Luther so immediately understood an important thing. Even if that act of blood against the nobility was spontaneous, and no caused by the Rome's intelligence of those times (at those times known under another term: ''perfidiousness''), it would have simply turned the Nobility against the Reform, because the Luther's teaching would have appeared as ''instigator of peasants' riots''.
So it is sudden clear that the true one who must be considered the spiritual supporter (if not also the material instigator) of the bloodshed was Rome. Rome understood that her future was depending from the result of the civil/revolutionary war in Germany. With the dirty water (the Peasants' riot), the nobility would have wiped away also the babies who produced that dirty water, I.e. Luther and his Reform, considered the ''spiritual fathers of the riots''. It is for this reason that Luther immediately invited also the Romish nobility in to fight the peasants' riots. Because it would have constrained the Roman Catholic leaders to get dirty also their hands with the blood of the peasants, in other words to get in enmity with an objective ally of the politic of their Romish church, and not to stay at the side with the arms crossed enjoining the spectacle of a civil/religious war in Germany wiping away the Reform. In the hypothesis they would have refused to join the ''war on peasants' terror'', they would have automatically demonstrated that they were the occult supporters and instigators of the uprising.
Not for a Quantum Mechanical coincidence I used the same language of George Bush when he started the invasion of Iraq as part of his ''war on Islamic terror''. Because meanwhile a genius like Luther never re-appeared, Rome could use his heritage in order to turn it against him the same in a symbolic way. Aren't the impoverished proletarian Arab masses constrained by the Romish World Democratic Government to stage the role of ''peasants rebelling the unrighteous oppression of a Western/secular world?''. Allusions, metaphors, farces and psychodramas are the central point in the development of the Continuing Counter Reformation and the underestimation of that is a deep mistake.
Rome and the Jesuits repeat the same schema, with variations of course, instigating every day ''peasant's riots''. See the 1848 revolutions, particularly the ones in Styria, Carniola, etc., where the intelligence of Slovenian bishop Slomšek let increase that ''peasants' riot'' against the central government of Vienna, till the point that today he is considered one of the most important Slovenian figure, for the Roman Catholics of course above the one of Primož Trubar. Or look at the open welcome by archbishop Gregorj Rožman of the Fascist aggressor in Yugoslavia in 1941 which instigated the increase of the military uprising of the Tito's partisans and favored the grip on power of the Communist party on the anti-fascist guerrilla. In its turn all that provoked a bloody reaction of the Italian Fascist occupation authorities and especially the one of the German authorities who were seeing the church of Rome and the Communist rebellion as secretly allied, especially after those twenty years of occupation of Slovenia territory (Rapallo's treaty borders) by the Fascist Italy.
Fascism oppressed the Slovenian priesthood who had its secret net of anti-fascist priests. And had a competitor in the anti-fascist struggle, the Bolshevism. Of course Germans were not blind, and observed how the continue warning against the ''threat of the Communism'' of the temporal coadjutor doc Janko Kralj (who at the same time, was an ardent anti-fascists and Slovenian nationalists) were strongly opposing to the Italian government laws about the language at the official religious rites, but were not so much heard by those oppressed priests the same who were mostly absorbed by the passive resistance against the Fascist authorities than by the 'holy' fight against Bolshevism. Those ideological attacks against the Communism in those twenty years could – for German political observers – have perfectly hidden an objective collaboration between the priests and the Communists, as both were enemy of Mussolini. If this allusive ideological and religious scenario was remembering to the German intelligence that old collaboration between riotous peasants and the nobility of Rome, aimed to destroy the Reform, it was surely not a casual effect.
But the principal goal of the ambiguous dealings of Janko Kralj, always with a feet in the priestly anti-fascist front and the other in that words of silent discrete contacts with important Fascist authorities, dealing consisting in a collaboration/armistice even with the Italian enemy justified in the name of the ''holy war against Bolshevism'', was just the inducement of the German observer in that automatic reflex of five centuries before.
That objective collaboration between the Communist riotous peasants and their priests in the Slovenia occupied by the German army, was allusively aired by the archbishop of Ljubljana (criminal of war) Gregorj Rožman, under whom also the priests in the German zone were submitted, when he welcomed in that Springtime 1941 the Fascist High Commissar Emilio Grazioli of Roman Catholic Fascist Italy with ''kisses & hugs'' (*). But a true peasants/priests' riot was instigated against the Germans incarnating now the role of the five hundreds years before Lutheran nobility. It is not a coincidence that the first arrests of the sentenced Slovenian in Second Trial of Trieste started in 1940, and continued all along the first months of the occupation of Yugoslavia, with the trial in the Autumn of 1941 and the death sentences at the beginning of December where just the Communist ones were condemned to death meanwhile the liberal ones went pardoned. But the details of this important phase of the war in another of my blogs. It is just sufficient the little I told you above to understand that the true snake in the mankind's paradise was not Bismarck but the papacy and the Jesuits' order.
....... . . . . . . . . INSIDE THE MIND OF ROME:
INSIDE THE MIND OF ROME – pedophilia scandal and Islam question in the Peasants' war/jacqueries of Romehttp://avlesbeluskesexposed.blogspot.com/2011/09/inside-mind-of-rome-pedophilia-scandal.html
(*) Wednesday, June 8, 2011
An objective collaboration
Friday, June 10, 2011
"Objective collaborations": 10th June 1941
(As I have no time, no resources, no money, no support at disposition, it is clear that what I wrote is affected by many errors and uncorrectness. I am not a prostitute lay journalist of this dirty Vatican 'tollerant' regime called 'democracy'. I have not the 51% of the Bank of America supporting my writings. I don't control the Casinò of Ostenda and neither Citroen and Peugeot as the General Superior did at least in 1958. So corrections and additions could appear in the future)