Sunday, August 21, 2011

II - How Rome controlled her 'charismatic' dictators

>

Part one

(It continues from the previous message). This way of operate is brightly witnessed in the Amber Path south during WWII, where a dust cloud of Romish organizations from the Catholic Action to the Sentinels were moving in a very ambiguous zone, between the open collaboration (with Fascist Italy) and the silent opposition. The commander of the coastal partisan detachement, the Spanish veteran Communist Ales Bebler was, despite his Romish ideology (Marxism), right when he affirmed that "unfortunately the situation on the field doesn't allow me to settle the scores with Janko Kralj". Janko Kralj, strict collaborator of Ciril Kotnik (exiled Yugo govt. emissary in the Vatican), was the perfect prototype of such ambiguity, where in front of the Slovene oppressed by Fascism they were playing the role of the "silent anti-fascist on the side of the oppressed ones", meanwhile with the occupation authorities they collaborated with the intelligence and informative activity. Under a comfortable "anti-fascist" masque, they could decree the life or death of the people, and so helped to clean the society from the 'undesired', meanwhile at the same time the most staunchly Romish supporters were kept in safe. Of course this blade had not only an edge pointed at the throat of the anti-fascist society where the modern and liberal element were leaved/pushed in the hands of Mussolini, the other edge of the blade was pointed at the throat of the same occupants, which were literally in the hands of the collaborators, being they able also to threaten the Fascist authorities with their control on the anti-fascist society:


Friday, November 14, 2008

“Mit brennender Sorge”: the words of Satan under a ‘christian’ disguise? – part two

URl: http://avlesbeluskesexposed.blogspot.com/2008/11/mit-brennendem-sorge-words-of-satan_14.html

Second and conclusive part

– the first part:

http://avlesbeluskesexposed.blogspot.com/2008/11/mit-brennendem-sorge-words-of-satan.html


------------------------------------------------------------------

“….3. Die Folgen der Enzyklika

Erst im Laufe des Samstages erhielt die Gestapo Hinweise auf die bevorstehende Aktion. Der stellvertretende Gestapo-Chef Reinhard Heydrich informierte Hitler persönlich und außerdem noch Goebbels, Göring, Himmler und den Reichsminister für kirchliche Angelegenheiten Hanns Kerrl.

Mitten in der Nacht ließ er folgendes Ergebnis seiner Recherche telegraphisch im ganzen Reich verbreiten:

,,Heydrich an alle Stapoleit- und Stapostellen, 21.03.1937 um 00.30 Uhr.

Der Wortlaut des morgen allgemein zur Verlesung kommenden Rundschreibens des Papstes ist dank ausgezeichneter Arbeit einer SD-Dienststelle sowie 2 Gestapo-stellen bereits bekannt. Es enthält hochverräterische Angriffe gegen den national-sozialistischen Staat. Ich ersuche, alle katholischen Kirchen auf die Vorlesung hin zu überwachen. Soweit die Kundgebung bereits im Druck erschienen ist, sind alle außerhalb der Kirchen und Pfarrhöfe greifbaren Exemplare zu beschlagnahmen. Soweit Personen außerhalb der Kirchen und Pfarrhöfe Druckschriften verteilen und es sich nicht um Geistliche handelt, sind diese sofort zu verhaften. Ihre Entfernung aus der Partei, ihren Gliederungen und angeschlossenen Verbänden, wie DAF, ferner Handwerkskammern und dergleichen ist sofort zu veranlassen. Sie sind sofort zur strafrechtlichen Aburteilung vor Gericht zu überstellen..."4

Es kam jedoch zu keinerlei Beschlagnahmungen. Da man sich nicht auf Machtkämpfe vor und in jeder Kirche einlassen wollte, wurden nur Privatpersonen verhaftet...“.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------


The tail of Lucifer is very thin, and you have to search it in the infamous interstices of their lies. The same author of this study is telling you the truth the Vatican wants to cover under its dirty lies. He is only showing to you the fear of the Nazi apparatus about a war with the church or Rome: „…Anyway nothing has been seized. As it was necessary to avoid any kind of clash among powers inside and in front of the churches, only private persons went arrested...“ (1). But if the same material actions of the same Nazi apparatus were evidently influenced by the fear to cause a reaction of the church of Rome (read: of the Roman Catholic community of Germany), it means that the Roman Catholic community of Germany had the sufficient political weight, the sufficient social numbers to make the German balance to turn decisively in the opposite direction respect the wishes of Hitler. And if Rome had this power in 1938, it had it also in 1933, only tens of times more strong. But Rome didn’t. The Vatican didn’t use the big weight of its German herd. The priests, the bishops, the thousands of Romanist orders, the thousands of Romanist schools, association, union trades went silenced because they had not to express a strong opposition to the ‘charismatic dictator’ – at the opposite, when possible, they were used to suppress any expression of concrete opposition to the Hitler’s regime which would have appeared among the same Catholics.

-----------------------------------------------------------

Am Palmsonntag konnte dann auch die Enzyklika ohne nennenswerte Störungen vorgetragen werden. In den meisten Pfarreien wurde sie zweigeteilt vorgetragen.

Der erste Teil wurde morgens während der Messe verlesen und der umfangreichere zweite Teil während einer Andacht am Nachmittag oder Abend.

Der Überraschungseffekt gelang sogar dermaßen, daß selbst am Tag nach der Verlesung dem Propagandaministerium immer noch kein Exemplar vorlag. Das Verbot der weiteren Verbreitung kam zu spät.

Am 27. März folgte eine ausführlichere Mitteilung der Gestapo aus der Stapoleitstelle München:
,,Betreff: Päpstliches Rundschreiben über die Lage der Katholischen Kirche im Deutschen Reich. Papst Pius XI. hat an die Erzbischöfe Deutschlands ein Rundschreiben über die Lage der katholischen Kirche im Deutschen Reich erlassen, das bereits am 21. März 1937 von den Kanzeln der Kirche verlesen wurde und in der Zwischenzeit auch im Druck erschienen ist. Da das Rundschreiben hochverräter-ische Angriffe gegen den nationalsozialistischen Staat enthält, wird folgendes angeordnet:
1. Sämtliche außerhalb der Kirchen und Pfarrhöfe greifbaren Exemplare des Rundschreibens sind zu beschlagnahmen. Auch die im Besitz von Privatpersonen vorgefundenen Einzelstücke sind einzuziehen.
Druckschriften, die sich in Händen von Geistlichen befinden, werden von dieser Maßnahme nicht berührt.
2. Sämtliche Personen, die sich mit der Verteilung der Schriften außerhalb der Kirchen und Pfarrhäuser befassen, sind, soweit es sich nicht um Geistliche handelt, sofort festzunehmen und umgehend dem Gericht zur strafrechtlichen Aburteilung zu überstellen. Ihre Entfernung aus der Partei, ihren Gliederungen und ange-schlossenen Verbänden, wie DAF, ferner Handwerkskammer und dergleichen, ist sofort zu veranlassen.
3. Kirchenblätter und kirchliche Amtsblätter, die das Rundschreiben abgedruckt haben, sind zu beschlagnahmen und auf die Dauer von drei Monaten zu verbieten.
4. Druckereien und Verlage, in denen das Rundschreiben hergestellt, bzw. verlegt wurde, sind sofort zu schließen. Die verantwortlichen Personen (Verleger, Drucker, Schriftleiter) sind unverzüglich hierher zu melden, damit von hier aus weitere Maßnahmen gegen sie ergriffen werden können. I.V. gez. Dr. Stepp"5
Die Intervention des Reiches gegen das päpstliche Rundschreiben kam zu spät. In einem Schnellbrief des Reichs- und preußischen Ministers für die kirchlichen Angelegenheiten vom 23. März 1937 heißt es:
,,Das päpstliche Rundschreiben an Erzbischöfe und Bischöfe Deutschlands vom
14. März stellt schwere Verletzung der im Reichskonkordat festgestellten Vereinbarungen dar. Es steht im krassen Widerspruch mit dem Geist des Konkordats und seinen ausdrücklichen Bestimmungen. Das Rundschreiben enthält schwere Angriffe auf das Wohl und Interesse des deutschen Staatswesens. Es versucht, die Autorität der Reichsregierung herabzusetzen, das Wohl des deutschen Staats-wesens nach außen zu schädigen und vor allen Dingen durch den unmittelbaren Appell des Vertragspartners der Reichsregierung an die katholischen Staatsbürger den inneren Frieden der Volksgemeinschaft zu gefährden. Für derartiges feindseliges Verhalten bietet das Reichskonkordat keine Freistatt. Es wird weder durch seinen Geist noch durch die ausdrücklichen Bestimmungen gedeckt. Daher werden den Bischöfen und sonstigen Ordinarien unter Berufung auf Artikel 16 des Reichs-konkordates Druck, Vervielfältigung und Vertreibung Rundschreibens in jeder Form verboten. In Vertretung H. MUHS" 6

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

So it is also possible to understand why the encyclical was issued developing it from a public pastoral letter. Please, read again an excerpt from the initial part of this study, and read what Herbert Immenkötter told:

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Daraufhin lud der Kardinalssekretär Pacelli im Auftrag des Papstes im Januar 1937 drei deutsche Kardinalerzbischöfe und zwei Bischöfe nach Rom ein.1 Unter ihnen befand sich auch Erzbischof Kardinal Michael von Faulhaber, der ausersehen war, den Text dieses Rundschreibens zu verfassen.
Herbert Immenkötter schreibt: ,,Für diese Aufgabe schien er bestens gerüstet: seit einer persönlichen Zusammenkunft mit Hitler acht Wochen zuvor hatte er im Weihnachtshirtenbrief und dann in einem Referat für die Fuldaer Bischofskonferenz die kirchliche Entwicklung der jüngsten Zeit sorgfältig analysiert und ohne Beschönigung kommentiert."2 Drei Tage später legte er diesen Entwurf schon vor, der dann später von Pacelli als Enzyklika ,,Mit brennender Sorge" überarbeitet und erweitert wurde. Die Enzyklika trägt das Datum des 14.
März 1937.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Herbert Immenkötter told that “…for this task (the writing of the papal letter), the best man was him (Faulhaber): after a personal meeting of archbishop Faulhaber with Adolph Hitler occurred eight weeks before he (Faulhaber) carefully and without embellishment analysed in the Christmas pastoral letter and in a report for the Bishop Conference in Fulda the evolution of the church during the early age…”. It is precisely from this particular that you can understand the reason why the Gestapo wasn’t able to get the encyclical issued in thousands of copies under the form of a papal circular letter: because they were absolutely not interested to get it, they just have got it.

The Gestapo, the Sicherheit Dienst, Heydrich, Himmler, Hitler, the Nazi elite knew well the content of the encyclical well before it went spread and read on the 27th March Sunday of the Palms. They knew the content of the future encyclical precisely in the same moment when the encyclical went previously issued under the public, open and accessible to everyone shape of a “pastoral Christmas letter” and of a “report for the Fulda’s bishops conference” which was not read in a secret meeting but in a legally authorized by the concordat meeting. It is a sign of mental insanity to be not aware that everything issued by a whatever kind of organization, association, community in Nazified Germany, was strictly monitored, analysed, tested and screened. Should have the Gestapo boss Heydrik looked at that “Christmas pastoral letter”, written by a man who met the ‘greatest son of Germany’ (I ask pardon to Bismarck for the blasphemy), a man – bishop Faulhaber - who was a very important hierarch of the same theocratic state with which the same ‘charismatic dictator/greatest son’ signed an epochal international agreement (the concordat), a man that issued that “pastoral letter” eight months after that meeting, so, should have Heydrich considered all that as a sort of disturb coming from the idle agents of his intelligence, who had nothing to do in order to kill the boredom than to spy the Romanist bishops in Germany?

The high hierarch of the Romanist theocratic state, the bishop Faulhaber, met the ‘charismatic dictator’ of Germany eight weeks before to issue the “Christmas pastoral letter” not only to have sufficient information from their first agent in Germany regarding the ideological and political situation of every social layer of the country, especially regards to the Protestant layer which was not totally under the Romanist control (as it is today) and so many information about it could have been gained only through the formally ‘secular’ (2) organization of the Romanist mercenaries, i.e. the National Socialist party, but, moreover, to communicate to their highest ‘charismatic’ agent in Berlin about the way he will be informed on the contents of the next encyclical, an encyclical which had to appear incognito under the deceptive shape of a “Christmas pastoral letter”.

And it was important to insert the Faulhaber’s Christmas pastoral letter in the report to the German bishops Conference in Fulda, because it was important to understand their reactions respect the future encyclical and their inner, deep true attitude toward the ‘charismatic dictator’ of Germany. The generals of the Vatican army, before the most important battle of the last five centuries, had to be examined by their Jesuit masters.


The Sicherheit Dienst, the Gestapo but it is quite believable that any other kind of conventional police force too, could have been informed about that letter, even the civil administrations managing permissions and authorizations related the spreading of the press, would have then informed their ‘charismatic dictator’ about the “pastoral letter” and so about the decisions of his Jesuit master related the contents of the next incoming ‘Anti-nazi’ encyclical. Hitler, like a diligent agent, once informed through this not-conventional way about the next incoming plan of the Jesuits, should have then adapted himself and his party to the encyclical of his Romanist masters, giving to his intelligence and Gestapo the opportune orders in order then, when the encyclical would be ‘suddenly’ appeared, to stage a ‘defeat’ of his intelligence the same. If you analyse the orders given by the Gestapo to its agents, you see that they were aimed – by a side - to stage the theatrical play of the “fight between the National Socialist party and the church of Rome”, by the other side to prevent any kind of effective action by their agents – under the alibi to avoid a “Machtkampf” aka a “War among powers”: “…1. All the copies of the circular (the encyclical) at disposition outside the churches and parishes have to be seized. Also the single copies in the hands of the private people have to be seized.

Printed works in the hands of the clergy, are not submitted to this disposition…” (3).

It seems that later, when the Nazi apparatus started to aim its repressive arm against Catholic schools and orders, they didn’t have all this care and fear when they putted under trial hundreds of Romanist priests and then sent them in the Lager. But for the reasons, we’ll see them later. So Heydrich, at the opposite of his ‘charismatic’ boss who expressed the formal intention to “squeeze the church like a toad”, feared the reaction of the Romanist priests. But, really speaking, he and his boss Hitler feared mostly the danger to put obstacles to the spreading of the same encyclical. Because meanwhile the true agents of that spreading, the Romanist priests, weren’t touched by the Gestapo dispositions, at the opposite the “Privatpersonen”, the common people in other words, could be arrested and heavy measures could have been taken against them. So the above disposition number 1, meanwhile was absolutely un-effective as regard the stopping of the knowledge about the papal circular letter, was very effective in instigating the people against the National Socialist power behind the directive, pushing so also the not interested people to get a copy of the encyclical. In fact the best way to arise a great interest in something is usually obtained with a (false, fake, spectacular and as regard the concrete effects un-effective) persecution: „…Anyway nothing has been seized. As it was necessary to avoid any kind of clash among powers inside and in front of the churches, only private persons went arrested....(….)…… The first part (of the papal circular letter/encyclical) was read at the morning during the Mass and the bigger second part was read in the afternoon or evening…” (4). The Romanist priest who had the task to spread the encyclical weren’t touched and they could do their job without any kind of disturb – coherently with the Gestapo’s directive. But the arrested and intimidated “Privatpersonen” added fuel to the interest for the content of the encyclical and so dragged all kind of people to hear about it in the afternoon reading.

About this plan only part of the high level ruling elite of the Nazi apparatus was aware. Low and medium levels were totally kept in ignorance on what was going on. This is not much but it is sure. “Compartimentalization” and agents kept in ignorance about the work done by their near sector of the security services was and is a common feature of any kind of intelligence. “Always uses the good faith actions of your unaware agents to pursue goals which are outside their knowledge and consciousness” is a rule ‘sanctified’ and transformed in founding dogmatic pillar of the same religious sect to which Faulhaber belonged. The Council of Trent putted it under the formal shape of the Canon 32.

So the diligent Nazi agents, working automatically like many Pavlovian dogs, pushed forward without realizing the Jesuits’ avalanche they the same were creating –having been deceived by their the same commanders! The little ball of snow shaped by the hands of Faulhaber after the meeting with his agent Adolph, grew with the indefatigable work of Pacelli and, under the surveillance of the Jesuits masters, now was ready to crash on the entire Roman Catholic community of Germany and on the entire country. Again Faulhaber was ready to stage another role, the role of the man who “takes on himself all the charges for the action”:

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Am 3. April.1937 übernimmt Erzbischof Kardinal Faulhaber die Verantwortung für das Rundschreiben in einem Brief an Herrn Dr. Valentin Mayer, Druckerei Höfling-München:
,,Für die strafrechtlichen Verhandlungen über das päpstliche Rundschreiben vom 14.März 1937 (Lage der katholischen Kirche im Deutschen Reich) erkläre ich, daß der Auftrag zur Drucklegung und zur Verlesung des Rundschreibens in den Kirchen meiner Erzdiäzöse von mir gegeben wurde und das Begleitschreiben an die Seelsorgstellen, das über die Verlesung nähere Anweisungen erteilte, mit meinem vollen Namen gezeichnet ist. Damit habe ich die moralische Verantwortung übernommen, wenn das Rundschreiben wirklich strafrechtliche Nachspiele haben sollte. In dem Maße, in dem ich die Verantwortung übernehme, will ich den Drucker entlasten, der in gutem Glauben einen Druckauftrag ausführen konnte, weil er keine polizeiliche Zensurstelle bildet, und der von der Minute ab, in der ihm das Verbot der Geheimen Staatspolizei bekannt wurde, kein einziges Stück mehr druckte. Ebenso will ich die braven Arbeiter entlasten, die sich in keiner Weise bewußt waren, etwas Unrechtes zu tun und deshalb nach gesundem Rechtsempfinden nicht gestraft werden können. Ich ermächtige Sie, sehr geehrter Herr Doktor, von dieser Erklärung jeden Ihnen gut scheinenden Gebrauch zu machen.
München, 3. April 1937, gez. Kardinal Faulhaber, Erzbischof von München"7
Faulhabers Brief half der Druckerei jedoch nicht:
,,14. Juni 1937. Betrifft: Einziehung volks- und staatsfeindlichen Vermögens; hier Buchdruckerei und Verlag Valentin Höfling in München, Lämmleinstr. 1 (Inhaber: Dr. Valentin Mayer). Beschluß:
Auf Grund des §1 Abs.1 des Gesetzes über die Einziehung kommunistischen Vermögens vom 26. Mai 1933 (RGBl. X. S. 293) in Verbindung mit dem Gesetz vom 14. Juli 1933 (RGBl.I, S.479) über die Einziehung volks- und staatsfeindlichen Vermögens und der ministerialen Bekanntmachung vom 19. September 1933
Nr. 3862 a 133, wird hiermit das gesamte Vermögen der Firma Buchdruckerei und Verlag Valentin Höfling in München, Lämmerstr. 1 - Inhaber Dr. Valentin Mayer in München, Potsdamerstr. 5 - unter Bestätigung der Beschlagnahmung am 11. Juni 1937 auf Grund §1 der VO des Herrn Reichspräsidenten zum Schutz von Volk und Staat vom 28. Februar 1933 (RGBl. I, S. 83) zugunsten des Landes Bayern eingezogen. gez. Christmann"8
Im August 1937 folgte noch eine weitere Maßnahme gegen den Drucker:
,,Der Präsident der Reichspressekammer. (Einschreiben mit Rückschein)
Betreff: Verlag Valentin Höfling, München, Lämmerstr. 1
Unter Bezugnahme auf den Erlaß des Herrn Reichsministers des Innern vom 25. Mai 1937 schließe ich Sie hiermit auf Grund des § 10 der I. Verordnung zur Durchführung des Reichskultukammergetzes vom 1. November 1933 (RGBl. I/1933 S. 797ff.) wegen mangelnder Zuverlässigkeit und Eignung mit sofortiger Wirkung aus der Reichspressekammer aus und untersage Ihnen jede weiter pressemäßige Betätigung. (Siegel) Im Auftrag: gez. Dr. Richter"9
Das vom Papst angestrebte Ziel, nämlich die Abwehr von Mißverständnissen, Abgrenzung von der nationalsozialistischen Lehre, Solidarisierung aller Gläubigen sowie Ermutigung und Stärkung des Abwehrwillens waren jedoch in hohem Maße erreicht.

Um aber die Kirche ebenfalls zur Rechenschaft zu ziehen, ohne sich auf einen Machtkampf einlassen zu müssen, befahl Hitler am 06. April 1937 die Wieder-aufnahme der Sittlichkeitsprozesse und deren propagandistische Vermarktung. Damit jedoch begnügte er sich nicht. Im Mai 1937 entwarf Hitler selbst ein Konzept, wie der Vernichtungsfeldzug gegen die Kirche zu Ende geführt werden müsse. In fünf Schritten sollte die Kirche gebeugt und dem nationalsozialistischen Staat zum Diener gemacht werden.

Beseitigung des Zölibats

Enteignung des Kirchenvermögens

Erschwerter Zugang zum Theologiestudium

Auflösung aller Orden und Klöster

Verbot der Erziehung durch kirchliche Personen

In einer langen Reihe von Schauprozessen wurden Hunderte von katholischen Ordensbrüdern und Geistlichen wegen angeblicher Sittlichkeits- und Devisen-vergehen abgeurteilt. Die Propaganda sprach die niedrigsten Instinkte einer sensationslüstigen Masse an, um die katholische Geistlichkeit zu verunglimpfen und das Ansehen der katholischen Kirche zu schädigen. Hunderte von katholischen Geistlichen wanderten in Konzentrationslager. Klöster und Klosterschulen wurden ebenso wie eine Reihe von Theologischen Hochschulen und Fakultäten geschlossen. Dies wurde vor allem in der Reaktionen der Nationalsozialisten in der Frage des Schulkampfes deutlich. Der Kirchenkampf ging in dieser heftigen Form weiter, bis der von Hitler entfesselte Krieg ihm wenigstens äußerlich ein Ende bereitete.

------------------------------------------------------------------------



But just a month later, the ‘charismatic dictator’ decided it was the time to stop the “extermination war on the church”:

“… In May 1937 the same Hitler developed the dispositions about the way on how to stop the annihilation war against the church…” (5). With five points regarding the prohibition to teach students by the clergy, the elimination of the celibacy, the seizing of the wealth of the church, the arising of obstacles to the access to theological studies and the loosing of orders and monasteries, the same monster, the creature of the Jesuit dr. Frankenstein, affirmed to not be his son. So the planned Vatican crusade for the annihilation of the greatest number of ‘heretics’ in Eurasia, and to change for ever for the benefit of Rome the religious map of Europe, could start without no one suspecting about the true dark inspirer of the incoming largest genocide in the human history.


But the ones who feared the most a possible „Machtkampf” or a clash among powers - the “Third Reich government vs. the Holy see” clash, were not Hitler and his minions, but the church of Rome. Again the figure of Hitler seems to be used as a sort of multipurpose actor, who, during his career as physical Fuehrer and later in the costumes of his manipulated historical figure, expresses – through ‘scientific’ researches – the goals, the wishes, the fears of his Romanist masters: “…ohne sich auf einen Machtkampf einlassen zu müssen…” – “…without to let himself to be dragged in a war among powers…”.

This sentence shows the difficulties in keeping the oppression of the Nazi apparatus on the Roman Catholic community firmly under the level over which it would have caused an open riot of the same Catholics against the Hitler’s regime. A precision work. An open riot/opposition would have meant from one side the urgency of Rome to oppress openly the same her community. From the other side it would have constrained Rome to follow, even if only apparently, the open rioting/opposition of the German Catholics, in order to not appear the supporter of Hitler’s dictatorship. And, as final consequence feared by Rome no more or less like a vampire is terrorized by the holy water and the crosses, to chose an apparent condemnation of the Hitler’s regime would have constrained Rome to openly attack in a decisive and not ambiguous way her ‘charismatic dictator’ of Germany the same. And all that meanwhile she was doing her best efforts to appear ‘hostage’ of Hitler. Dr. Frankestein would have been constrained to destroy his the same creature meanwhile she was still lying on his surgical bed in his laboratory: a nightmare for Rome.

After having seen the behaviour of the church of Rome, if I was a Roman Catholic, I would think that my divine emperor of Rome is not the vicarious of Christ, but the Vicarious of Satan. Satan the lord of lies. After having taken knowledge of the Hitler’s five points you could well affirm that the Roman Catholic church in Germany has been not kneeled (“gebeugt”), but simply annihilated. With those acts Hitlers destroyed the concordat. Because the same Jesuits wanted to destroy that piece of paper which was nothing else than an alibi. The Jesuits understood very well that powerful historical figures like the one of Bismarck cannot be destroyed with a direct attack. Their Sun Tzu manual teaches that you have to drag away from your enemies the sympathy, and as in the case of Bismarck and the Kulturkampf this was impossible to do with the usual calumniation and false flag attacks which would immediately have suggested the true occult mastermind. The only way was the building of a sort of ‘sosia’ of the Protestant Iron Kanzler. And then to use the same words of the Protestant enemy but aimed no more against the Vatican and its Jesuits, but against a third part, on which to drag and to focuse the attention and the feelings of the Germans. Substitute the word with an initial “J” with another, completely different, always starting with “J”. This is the core of the Hitler’s rhetorical Nazi propaganda. So the Jews went persecuted also to weaken the historical consciousness of the Protestants (and of the honest Roman Catholics) about the true German and European question, the “Jesuit Question”. And doing this firstly confusing it with the “Jewish Question” (6), then submerging it with the material “Fight against the perfidous Jews”, to finally drown it in the darkness of the collective oblivion of the German people who, once, was well aware that the true deadly enemy for Germany was not coming from Jerusalem, but from Rome.

Is the same man that clearly and strongly affirmed that “the church of Rome was a toad to be squeezed” who helped that toad to survive in the homeland of Luther with a concordat. I ask myself, why he didn’t sign a concordat with the “rats to be squeezed” too, the Jewish Rabbis? Was for real the Romanist church in the hands of Hitler? Till the point he granted her a concordat? Following the conveniences Hitler in a moment becomes a very powerful man who keeps at his willing the church of Rome with a gun at her temple – in another moment he is depicted like a man fearing the Catholic counterpart when he is not able to stop the ‘firm condemn’ of his regime by the church of Rome. On the other front the Vatican legitimises its power and especially its presence in Germany basing that on his great influence, but at the same time it is not able to use that ‘power’ and that ‘great influence’ to stop the same dictator who – guess what - fears that power and great influence the same! How is it possible to term all that? I name it: a farce. A Nazi-Vatican, Jesuit farce.

The concordat that the ‘charismatic dictator’ of Germany granted to Rome has been signed having in mind its the same later destruction. Hitler squeezed the concordat in order to not squeeze the church of Rome, because he had to show that he was a ‘real enemy’ of Vatican and of the Jesuits just in the precise moment he was going to realize the secret goals of his ‘real enemies’, the final secret, theological, Inquisitorial cleaning of Eurasia – and the definitive destruction of Prussia.

So, for more than seventy years, we lived in an ocean of lies. The enmity of Bismarck towards the Whore of Rome and its Jesuits had to be destroyed shadowing it first with a more noisy, artificial and theatrical ‘enmity’ of the ‘charismatic dictator’ towards….. the same Roman Catholics who didn’t forget the historical truth of the real Public Enemy N.1 of Germany, the evil Jesuit order expelled in the previous century. You have only to read the reports of the Gestapo and their bosses to understand the care they putted in order to make them sound “Kulturkampf”. Again Jesuits used the weapon of their enemies to destroy them. But before to start the final war of religious cleaning of Eurasia, they had to clean away all the ‘enemies within’. Before to start a war (a religious war), the army have to be cleaned from all the possible inner saboteurs. So all the doubtful and suspect battalions which could take the side of the enemy once on the battlefield, have to be loosed. And again their ‘charismatic dictator’ and his party, the secular glove to hide the Loyola’s hand, did the dirty job: „…In a long sequence of public spectacular trials, hundreds of clergymen belonging to orders and priests cause their alleged violation of the moral values went putted under judgement… (….)…. Hundreds of Catholic priests went in concentration camps. Monastries and monastic schools as many theological high school and faculties were closed….“ (7).

The Jesuits now, just one year before the start of the final part of their II Thirty Years war (1914 – 1945) could well close a good part of their theological Romanist apparatus in Germany. Now, for at least seven years, they’ll have no more need of it. No more need of ideological deceptions, of political plots, of subtle propaganda and of economical tampering of the cursed homeland of the cursed Luther. The fire, the blade and the genocidal mass murder will have done the dirty job for seven years against their ‘heretic’ enemies of Germany and Eurasia. So they could well ‘sacrifice’ during those ‘wonderful’ seven years, some pieces of their Romanist theological intellectual machine.



The orders and association inside the same Romanist church who were the most warm, silent enemies of the Jesuits the same went destroyed under the alibi of the tyrannical Hitler’s regime. Roman Catholic organizations and orders ‘infected’ by the Lutheran thought since long time in the Jesuits’ purges list, went closed & terminated. Adolph didn’t sent to the Konzentration Lager the most warm Romanist priest supporter of his regime, this is sure. And neither touched the author of the starting core of the ‘anti-nazi’ encyclical – bishop Faulhaber who served the Antichrist in Rome as archbishop of Munich from 1917 to 1952.

Is it still tolerable today to hear the cries of a Vatican which, meanwhile was complaining to be ‘hostage’ of the ‘charismatic dictator’ of Germany, was seen by the same Adolph Hitler as a powerful organization able to smash down his the same dictatorship? The true answer to this question has not to be given by any ‘scientific’, ‘authoritative’, ‘official’ commission, be it a Vatican one, an ‘ecumenical’ one or one among the hundreds and thousands of ‘secular’ academic commissions built up by ‘experts’. This is no matter of dogmas and no one has the power on his earth to change the judgement of a conscience, especially the ones who pretend to be the ‘vicarious’ of Jesus – really speaking they are only vicarious of Satan, their Lord of the Lies.


What happened that Sunday of the Palms in all the Romanist churches of the Third Reich, has been told in that famous documentary about the Hitlerian ‘oppression’ on the church of Rome in Germany I told about in my previous message (8) . The deeper reason for the contradictory disposition of the Gestapo are now even more clear. All the priests in service that day read the encyclical. Every German Roman Catholic present heard about the allusive condemnation of the National Socialist regime by the papacy. Every German Roman Catholic who was a true Christian and an opponent to the Hitler’s regime learned that his pope was on his side and not on the Hitler’s side. Every German Roman Catholic who was a true Christian, an opponent to the Hitler’s regime and had a sufficient courage to not lie to himself and to his neighbour in those hard times, with that encyclical was invited to expose him/herself as an opponent to the National Socialist regime. How many Jesuits’ agents, Vatican and Gestapo spies were ready in the Romanist churches and outside them, hidden among the Catholic herd, on the workplaces and in the cultural Roman Catholic circles, ready to classify all the Roman Catholic community who was instigated to expose outside at the light of the sun his true attitude toward the Ledochowsky’s ‘charismatic dictator’ of Germany? How many priests who read that encyclical helped to detect among their believers the opponents to the Vatican Socialist regime? How many informers and delators entered in action the sequent days, months and years, with their ears well opened in order to capture among the Roman Catholics of Germany the least whispering caused by the impressive encyclical? How many reports went filed about the Roman Catholics who opposed to the papal National Socialist party and his Inquisitorial regime? With the order given through that contradictory disposition to their agents to seize every possible copy of the papal circular letter containing the encyclical outside the churches, Gestapo, the ‘charismatic dictator’ and his party, the Jesuits, wanted absolutely to avoid that the people could read the encyclical in their home, just after having picked up the leaflets taken outside the churches. When the people was shacked inside the soul after having heard or read those sentences, the Romanist priests, the true disguised Gestapo agents, the Sicherheit Dienst and SS agents, and the Jesuits present in the churches, should have captured the least emerging sentiment coming from the inner deep soul of the Romanist herd, and detected the true inner sentiments of every single sheep of their herd.

Does require to you a great intellectual effort to understand that with your open response to that encyclical, you could determine your destiny when the war started? Stalingrad instead Paris, Rome instead the Sahara. A sure death instead a possibility to survive. Finally Rome could have the revenge on his the same ‘beloved’ herd. If the encyclical pushed you to oppose to their Hitlers, it means that you fell in the Vatican trap: if you didn’t believe that were the Jews or the Communists the threat it means that you were still supporting the old Bismarck Kulturkampf which fought the only true infected poniard stuck in the core of Germany: the Order of Loyola. That encyclical was only a tool in the hands of the Jesuits for the religious cleaning among their herd the same. Millions of Roman Catholics, who were true German patriots and opposed to the greatest traitor of Germany coming from Austria, after being classified by the Gestapo and by the Jesuits, weren’t sent to the concentration camps. No, they were first exploited to slaughter other ‘heretics’ all along Eurasia, And then, at the end, when the job was nearly to be completed, they the same went butchered in the frozen steppes of Russia under the lead of the secret brother of their ‘charismatic dictator’, the Jesuit priest, Roman Catholic Joseph Stalin. Or burned alive under the phosphorus of the allied bombings, whose targets could have been well communicated by an organization present on both fronts of the war, the organization of the church of Rome. Wasn’t the Roman Catholic grandfather of the today biggest Italian party leader Walter Veltroni, the monarchic Yugoslavia ambassador to the Holy See Ciril Kotnik, in contact with both the collaborationist Nazi-priest of occupied Slovenia and the exiled Monarchic Yugoslav government in London? Or you are lying also to yourself and you don’t admit that if for real the true intention of Pacelli was the fight against the(ir) ‘charismatic dictator’ of Germany, he shouldn’t have to act in such a manner that would have exposed to the Hitler’s butchers the most warm opponents to National Socialism belonging to his Catholic herd, pushing them to a sure death? The answer is only one, because Pacelli and Ledochowsky wanted to exterminate all the Roman Catholics who were opponents to the(ir) ‘charismatic dictator’ of Germany and so to their ‘Kampf’ to exterminate the Kulturkampf and the Protestantism from North Europe. Today, A.D. 2008, they are near to reach the objective, with a nearly totally de-Christianized East Germany and former Prussia and a totally confused, chaotic, Islamized Germany. For this reason, 70 years ago, they brought forth that kind of Vatican toilette paper on which they spread the lying faeces of the Antichrist and named it: “Mit brennender Sorge”. The “Sorge” evacuated from the intestine of their lord, Lucifer. That stinking “brennende Sorge” is the proof which shows that Hitler was not a mad man who took mad decisions in the war, because he was doing another secret war, hidden under the ‘official’ war. The Catholic caporal of Austria simply executed the orders of his master, the General Superior Wladimir Ledochowsky, and dedicated himself and the SS to pursue with lucidity and awareness a secret, not declared war whose goal was to cause the greatest number of German, ‘heretic’ Protestant or ‘deviated’ Catholic human losses. Beheading once for all the same German spirit who united in 1872 both Catholics and Protestants against the Romanist Whore.


Pacelli and Ledochowsky had to do all that keenly. First they built their guillotine named: National Socialism. Then, betraying and deceiving their the same herd about the true nature of that strange machine, they succeeded in dragging their unaware ‘beloved’ Catholic German herd in the same building yard of that machine and then to put their head under its blade. The sad history of the ‘Christian’ aka Roman Catholic party in Germany teaches you on how the Catholic herd caged in their Jesuitical party collaborated discretely to the rising of the ‘charismatic dictator’. Then, after they were sure that nothing could have demolished that machine and that the millions of Catholics were strongly tied with their head under the blade, they instigated their ‘beloved’ herd to expose their inner deep sentiment towards the same final construction. And then, the ‘charismatic’ Roman Catholic guillotine of Germany could start to work at full regime, without pause, for seven years. In Russia, in Africa, in the forests of Yugoslavia, in the cold waters of the Atlantic ocean, and in the hundreds of Dresden putted at the stake by the Inquisitorial aerial fire.


Pacelli and Ledochowsky should be treated exactly as it was used to do by their the same ancestor popes in their beloved Romanist Middle Age. Sanctification? Their chariots should be dragged away from their graves and hanged in Saint Peter square - exactly just like the old Roman Catholic popes did to their previous competitors - in order that their last rests could be finally devoured by the worms and insects. The ghosts of eighty millions of butchered ‘heretics’ in their Second Thirty Years war (1914 – 1945) are crying for that. But I think that we don’t need to take those chariots from the holes where they are lying, imitating their bloody ancestors. It is sufficient to know that the souls of Ledochowsky and Pacelli are burning for ever in the Hell.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notes


(1) “…Es kam jedoch zu keinerlei Beschlagnahmungen. Da man sich nicht auf Machtkämpfe vor und in jeder Kirche einlassen wollte, wurden nur Privatpersonen verhaftet...“.


(2) ….’secular’ and apparently ‘anti-Catholic’, appearing so ‘worthy of trust’ at the eyes of the same Protestants who then would have had no difficulties to confide their anti-Romanist, eventually anti-Jesuit feelings to their Nazi comrades/spies of Jesuits.


(3). “....1. Sämtliche außerhalb der Kirchen und Pfarrhöfe greifbaren Exemplare des Rundschreibens sind zu beschlagnahmen. Auch die im Besitz von Privatpersonen vorgefundenen Einzelstücke sind einzuziehen.
Druckschriften, die sich in Händen von Geistlichen befinden, werden von dieser Maßnahme nicht berührt...“.


(4) “…Es kam jedoch zu keinerlei Beschlagnahmungen. Da man sich nicht auf Machtkämpfe vor und in jeder Kirche einlassen wollte, wurden nur Privatpersonen verhaftet....(....).... Der erste Teil wurde morgens während der Messe verlesen und der umfangreichere zweite Teil während einer Andacht am Nachmittag oder Abend....“


(5) „….Im Mai 1937 entwarf Hitler selbst ein Konzept, wie der Vernichtungsfeldzug gegen die Kirche zu Ende geführt werden müsse…“.


(6) The “Jewish Question” or how Jesuits and Vatican created it (the “Jewish Question” is a term used in the XIX century in the “La Civiltà Cattolica” Jesuit magazine) in Poland, pushing for the enmity between Jews and Roman Catholic Polish people in the previous three decades to prepare the field for the future incoming theological cleaning of Poland by Hitler and Stalin – see my third comment about Poland on Wlodimir Ledochowski's Masonic Tool FDR message of Douglas Willinger's CCR blog:

http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2008/11/wlodimir-ledochowski-masonic-tool-fdr.html


(7). “…In einer langen Reihe von Schauprozessen wurden Hunderte von katholischen Ordensbrüdern und Geistlichen wegen angeblicher Sittlichkeits- und Devisen-vergehen abgeurteilt... (....) ...Hunderte von katholischen Geistlichen wanderten in Konzentrationslager. Klöster und Klosterschulen wurden ebenso wie eine Reihe von Theologischen Hochschulen und Fakultäten geschlossen.....“.


(8) See the message of Saturday, August 23, 2008“The miserable buffoonery of the “church of Rome ‘victim’ of Hitler”:

http://avlesbeluskesexposed.blogspot.com/2008/08/miserable-buffoonery-of-church-of-rome.html



-------------------------------------------------
(As I have no time, no resources, no money, no support at disposition, it is clear that what I wrote is affected by many errors and uncorrectness. I am not a prostitute lay journalist of this dirty Vatican 'tollerant' regime called 'democracy'. I have not the 51% of the Bank of America supporting my writings. I don't control the Casinò of Ostenda and neither Citroen and Peugeot as the General Superior did at least in 1958. So corrections and additions could appear in the future)

No comments:

Post a Comment