Remember that the best way to control her dictators was, for the Romish church, to put them at the power and then to push 'em against the Roman Catholic population of their countries. Once Himmler and Hitler (I too believe as said in the site http://one-evil.org/, that Himmler was over Hitler) got the absolute power then Rome agitated against them the Roman Catholic basis (von Galen, Mit brennnender Sorge, etc.) in order to make appear to 'em clear that Rome had in the hands the keys to control the unity of the country and hence to obtain in this way a docile obedience - for this reason it is important to publish here some old messages appeared in my ABE blog:
Friday, November 14, 2008
“Mit brennender Sorge”: the words of Satan under a ‘christian’ disguise? – part oneURL: http://avlesbeluskesexposed.blogspot.com/2008/11/mit-brennendem-sorge-words-of-satan.html
The Pacelli’s elaborated 1937 encyclical was not only part of the worst crime committed against the entire humanity, but especially a crime against their the same Roman Catholic herd of Germany.
First part of two
– the second part:
Titel: Papst Pius` XI. Enzyklika "Mit brennender Sorge" vom 14. März 1937 im Vergleich mit dem Entwurf des Münchener Erzbischofs Kardinal Michael Faulhaber
Autor: Ulli Stegmeyer
Fach: Geschichte - Nationalsozialismus, II. Weltkrieg
Veranstaltung: Hauptseminar: Kirche und Nationalsozialismus
Institution/Hochschule: Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg
Dateigröße: 79 KB
Dozent: Prof. Dr. Georg Denzler
Hauptseminar: Kirche und Nationalsozialismus
Thema der Arbeit: Papst Pius` XI. Enzyklika ,,Mit brennender Sorge" vom 14. März 1937 im Vergleich mit dem Entwurf des Münchener Erzbischofs Kardinal Michael Faulhaber
Verfasserin: Ulli Stegmeyer
08. Semester, Realschullehramt Deutsch/Geschichte
1. Einleitung 2
2. Die Entstehung der Enzyklika ,,Mit brennender Sorge" 2
3. Die Folgen der Enzyklika 3
4. Die Endfassung der Enzyklika 7
5. Die Enzyklika im Vergleich mit dem Entwurf Faulhabers 9
5.1. Die Einleitungen - Unterschiede und Übereinstimmungen 9
5.2. Die Bibelzitate 9
5.3. Die Rolle des Reichskonkordats 10
5.4. Der reine Gottglaube 11
5.5. Der ,,Höhepunkt der Offenbarung" im Evangelium Jesu Christi 11
5.6. Der Kirchenglaube 12
5.7. Die Umdeutung heiliger Worte und Begriffe 12
5.8 Die sieben religiösen Grundbegriffe: Offenbarung, Glaube, Unsterblichkeit, Erbsünde, Kreuz, Demut und Gnade 13
5.9. An die Jugend 14
6. Schlußbetrachtung 15
1937 brach der Kampf zwischen dem Hitler-Regime und der katholischen Kirche aus. Schon vorher gab es Konflikte, da Hitler und seine Partei sich nicht durch das Reichskonkordat gebunden sahen, und es somit zu Verletzungen der kirchlichen Befugnisse kam. Trotz politischer Übergriffe versuchte die Kirche lange einen offenen Kampf zu vermeiden.
As the Roman Catholic church – in the effort to destroy and then to rebuild as its slave the Protestant Germany - the ugly mother of the National Socialism was, she had to push away the evidence of the direct link with its creature, and a public, largely advertised, apparently exhibited in front of the eyes of all the world ‘war’ with her evil son the same, was the better mean to cancel the suspects. But the Jesuits learned well the James Whale’s movie and they would have not fallen in the same error of the dr. Frankenstein who was blamed for having created the monster. So before to start the final and the most bloody part of the Counter Reformation war in Eurasia, after to have created the National Socialist Inquisitorial sword, the possessor of this sword had to injury himself with its weapon the same, in order to print in the mind not only of the present population but also in the mind of the following future generations, the impressive idea that the hands taking up the National Socialist dagger and, moreover, the creators of the it were not the Vatican ones.
2. Die Entstehung der Enzyklika ,,Mit brennender Sorge"
Da durch das Propagandaministerium die Kirche in den Augen der Gläubigen unglaubwürdig gemacht werden sollte, war es der Kirche nur möglich dem mit regelmäßigen Informationen von kirchlichen Stellen entgegenzuwirken. Durch die Kontrolle des Propagandaministeriums waren der Kirche alle gängigen Informations-wege verwehrt. Ein päpstliches Rundschreiben konnte also nur unter strengster Geheimhaltung verfaßt werden.
Daraufhin lud der Kardinalssekretär Pacelli im Auftrag des Papstes im Januar 1937 drei deutsche Kardinalerzbischöfe und zwei Bischöfe nach Rom ein.1 Unter ihnen befand sich auch Erzbischof Kardinal Michael von Faulhaber, der ausersehen war, den Text dieses Rundschreibens zu verfassen.
Herbert Immenkötter schreibt: ,,Für diese Aufgabe schien er bestens gerüstet: seit einer persönlichen Zusammenkunft mit Hitler acht Wochen zuvor hatte er im Weihnachtshirtenbrief und dann in einem Referat für die Fuldaer Bischofskonferenz die kirchliche Entwicklung der jüngsten Zeit sorgfältig analysiert und ohne Beschönigung kommentiert."2 Drei Tage später legte er diesen Entwurf schon vor, der dann später von Pacelli als Enzyklika ,,Mit brennender Sorge" überarbeitet und erweitert wurde. Die Enzyklika trägt das Datum des 14. März 1937.
Schon zwei Tage später erhielten alle deutschen Bischöfe ein gedrucktes Exemplar, das ihnen über Kuriere der Nuntiatur überbracht worden war. Dieses Rund-schreiben wurde am 21. März 1937, am Palmsonntag, verlesen. Sie hatten nur fünf Tage Zeit, um die für ihre Diäzösen benötigten Exemplare herzustellen. Unter größter Geheimhaltung gelang dennoch der Vertrieb von über 300 000 Exemplaren.3
The National Socialist party had to be informed by its masters of Rome about the instruction on how to bring Europe to the final Inquisitorial butchery. As it was impossible to propose a normal diplomatic link with official messengers and official documents stating the progress in the Counter Reformation war, Rome agreed with its Nazi traitor of Germany and executioners of the Luther’s heritage to pass to them the information under the more impressive and believable method of the spying activity. Two secret brothers engaged in a fake war will never let the public to discover them drinking and talking pleasantly around a table, and the information one knows about the other is always a product of a ‘spying’ activity and not of a normal official exchange of information.
So it was very important in January 1937 to call 3 cardinal archbishops and 2 bishops in Rome in order to give the strong impression of a sort of ‘state of war’ between Hitler and the papacy. Like the Freemasonry: the most it is excommunicated, the most their members are carrying out very important jobs for the sake of the Vatican. Among those 5 generals of the Vatican, the archbishop Faulhaber, a person involved with the Bolshevik riot of Munich (and the man who in 1951 in Munich will consecrate as priest the future Benedict XVI). Notice how these Marxist revolutionary attempts constituted opportune alibis to create the first military core of the later SS and SA corps: those first military squads were the “Freiekorps” (1). So here you have the answer for the quick evolving of the Bolshevik attempts, having the Red insurgency only the secret goal to ignite the rising of the National Socialist army – a pure theatrical role, and after the creation of the first core of the National Socialist organization, the German revolutionary Bolsheviks went suppressed and became only a record in the books of the historians (2).
From historical sources we came to the knowledge that the “Mit Brennender Sorge” encyclical has been developed in consequence of an order Faulhber received in Rome from Pacelli during the meeting with those 5 German cardinal and bishops. For this purpose archbishop Faulhaber developed a Christmas pastoral letter, a letter then transformed in a report for the Bishop Conference in Fulda. And the most interesting thing is that the pastoral letter was written “… after a personal meeting of archbishop Faulhaber with Adolph Hitler occurred eight weeks before…” (3).
Did bishop Faulhaber, before to start the writing of the core of the near future deceptive encyclical, receive suggestions and advertisings from a man who knew well the social situation of Germany? A man with whom Faulhaber was in a secret spiritual communion? A man who, since the end of the WWI (see “suor Pascalina memories” – go to Bavarian nunciature link in note 1) was in confidence with the Bavarian nuncio Pacelli? The Roman Catholic caporal from Austria nested in the once Protestant capital Berlin, was the perfect man from whom to have vital information about the intrigues and secrets of the Nazi ruling elite of Germany, and could have communicated the “state of the art” of the dictatorship.
In fact the pastoral letter / report to the Bishop Conference in Fulda was quickly sent to Pacelli and became the foundation of the famous “Mit Brennender Sorge” encyclical, issued on the 14th March 1937. After further two days, on the 16th March, the encyclical, thanks to the couriers of the nunciature, was putted in the hands of all the Roman Catholic bishops of Germany. They had only 5 days before the date of 21st March in order to copy and spread that strange circular arrived with anxious hurry from Rome in all the German dioceses. The 21st March was the Sunday of the Palms, and all the Roman Catholics of Germany were going to gather together in the churches. Waiting the German Romanist believers, 300,000 copies of the “Mit Brennender Sorge” were lying on the altars of all the Roman Catholic churches in Germany, ready to be read by the priests and so to be heard by ALL the Roman Catholics of Germany. Another Vatican “100 Flowers Campaign” could start.
(1) See the thread on the old The Unhived Mind about the numerological connections among the Nazi-putsch of Munchen, his Nazi-heroes, Faulhaber the bishop of Munchen , his young priest by him consecrated Ratzinger, and the discrete presence of the number 16:
“Benedict The 16th and the 16 Nazi 'Heroes' Of The, Putsch Of Munich”
For the general numerological and symbolic occult core of the Vatican sect, see also the “The Saturnalian Brotherhood” section of the The Unhived Mind:
As the regards the links among the Soviet Republic of Bavaria with the Vatican,…
…see the interesting events in a Munich in the hands of the atheist Reds in November 1918, a city and emptied from any kind of diplomatic foreign representatives except…. the Vatican one, the nunciature with the nuncio Pacelli which welcomed a “Catholic caporal of Austria”:
“…Came Armistice Day, November 11, 1918, the Reich was devastated . The Kaiser had fled for the safety of Holland.
Power-drunk from overthrowing czarist Russia, Bolshevik mobs flying red flags overran Bavaria. All Munich's diplomatic legations returned to their home countries. The Vatican nunciature alone remained….”. Quoted also in Continuing Counter Reformation blog:
Interesting to note how the later “Munich-putsch” or “Beer Hall Putsch” whose “Freikorps” went created as opportune reaction to the Bolshevik threat of five years before (the Soviet Republic of Bavaria), saw archbishop of Munich Faulhaber in a very impeccable and staged role of the ‘third part over the clashing fronts’:
“…There was one member of the cabinet who was not at the Bürgerbräu Keller: Franz Matt, the vice-premier and minister of education and culture. A staunchly conservative Catholic, he was having dinner with the Archbishop of Munich, Cardinal Michael von Faulhaber and the Papal Nuncio to Bavaria, Archbishop Eugenio Pacelli (who would later become Pope Pius XII), when he learned of the putsch. He immediately telephoned von Kahr. When he found the man vacillating and unsure, Matt decisively began plans to set up a rump government-in-exile in Regensburg and composed a proclamation calling upon all police, armed forces, and civil servants to remain loyal to the government….”.
Meanwhile the Freikorps, headed by their Austrian caporal five years before funded by the same Pacelli, were doing a training test for the later 1933 Vatican coup of Hitler, they were directly controlling the most delicate link of their Counter Reformation chain, the same fake and theatrical opposition to the “Beer Hall Putsch”. A Vatican chain which was going to tie the entire Germany to the Jesuits’ stake. And now we can also well understand why archbishop cardinal Faulhaber headed then the "International Catholic League against Antisemitism and Racism Amici Israël" (Corrected later - see below excerpt) from 1925 to 1928, a Romanist league which dragged many converted Jews: as demonstrated four centuries before, with the Huguenots massacre, Rome, before to exterminate the ‘heretics’, usually deceives them with ‘ecumenical magic’. The same Vatican career of Faulhaber, archishop of Munich from 1917 to 1952, a uninterrupted carrer also during the age of the 'charismatic' killer of Jews Hitler, demonstrates too the true occult goals of that international league....
(Corrected 15th November 2008 12:40: of course the true name of the league headed by Faulhaber was not “Catholic anti-Semite League” but "International Catholic League against Antisemitism and Racism Amici Israël"; I added then a further comment: "The same Vatican career of Faulhaber, .....the true occult goals of that international league....")
(2) This is the reason for which, betraying the same ‘theories’ of Karl Marx, in the industrially developed countries of Italy and Germany the ‘proletarian’ revolution failed, meanwhile in the rural Russia it got the power. Because in Italy and in Germany the Bolshevism served only to instigate the reaction which built the Fascism and the National Socialism, in Russia the Bolshevism had to go to the power because there it had not to play a ‘theatrical’ role, but to physically butcher the ‘heretic’ Orthodoxies of Russia – and their anti-Vatican, Byzantine nobility:
“Wlodimir (Vladimir) Ledochowski: Humanity's Worst Criminal- Not only the 3rd Reich but also the U.S.S.R.”
(3) „…Seit einer persönlichen Zusammenkunft mit Hitler acht Wochen zuvor hatte er im Weihnachtshirtenbrief und dann in einem Referat für die Fuldaer Bischofskonferenz die kirchliche Entwicklung der jüngsten Zeit sorgfältig analysiert und ohne Beschönigung kommentiert…“.
“…for this task (the writing of the papal letter), the best man was him (Faulhaber): after a personal meeting of archbishop Faulhaber with Adolph Hitler occurred eight weeks before he (Faulhaber) carefully and without embellishment analysed in the Christmas pastoral letter and in a report for the Bishop Conference in Fulda the evolution of the church during the early age…”
(As I have no time, no resources, no money, no support at disposition, it is clear that what I wrote is affected by many errors and uncorrectness. I am not a prostitute lay journalist of this dirty Vatican 'tollerant' regime called 'democracy'. I have not the 51% of the Bank of America supporting my writings. I don't control the Casinò of Ostenda and neither Citroen and Peugeot as the General Superior did at least in 1958. So corrections and additions could appear in the future)