Sunday, August 21, 2011

II - How Rome controlled her 'charismatic' dictators

>

Part one

(It continues from the previous message). This way of operate is brightly witnessed in the Amber Path south during WWII, where a dust cloud of Romish organizations from the Catholic Action to the Sentinels were moving in a very ambiguous zone, between the open collaboration (with Fascist Italy) and the silent opposition. The commander of the coastal partisan detachement, the Spanish veteran Communist Ales Bebler was, despite his Romish ideology (Marxism), right when he affirmed that "unfortunately the situation on the field doesn't allow me to settle the scores with Janko Kralj". Janko Kralj, strict collaborator of Ciril Kotnik (exiled Yugo govt. emissary in the Vatican), was the perfect prototype of such ambiguity, where in front of the Slovene oppressed by Fascism they were playing the role of the "silent anti-fascist on the side of the oppressed ones", meanwhile with the occupation authorities they collaborated with the intelligence and informative activity. Under a comfortable "anti-fascist" masque, they could decree the life or death of the people, and so helped to clean the society from the 'undesired', meanwhile at the same time the most staunchly Romish supporters were kept in safe. Of course this blade had not only an edge pointed at the throat of the anti-fascist society where the modern and liberal element were leaved/pushed in the hands of Mussolini, the other edge of the blade was pointed at the throat of the same occupants, which were literally in the hands of the collaborators, being they able also to threaten the Fascist authorities with their control on the anti-fascist society:


Friday, November 14, 2008

“Mit brennender Sorge”: the words of Satan under a ‘christian’ disguise? – part two

URl: http://avlesbeluskesexposed.blogspot.com/2008/11/mit-brennendem-sorge-words-of-satan_14.html

Second and conclusive part

– the first part:

http://avlesbeluskesexposed.blogspot.com/2008/11/mit-brennendem-sorge-words-of-satan.html


------------------------------------------------------------------

“….3. Die Folgen der Enzyklika

Erst im Laufe des Samstages erhielt die Gestapo Hinweise auf die bevorstehende Aktion. Der stellvertretende Gestapo-Chef Reinhard Heydrich informierte Hitler persönlich und außerdem noch Goebbels, Göring, Himmler und den Reichsminister für kirchliche Angelegenheiten Hanns Kerrl.

Mitten in der Nacht ließ er folgendes Ergebnis seiner Recherche telegraphisch im ganzen Reich verbreiten:

,,Heydrich an alle Stapoleit- und Stapostellen, 21.03.1937 um 00.30 Uhr.

Der Wortlaut des morgen allgemein zur Verlesung kommenden Rundschreibens des Papstes ist dank ausgezeichneter Arbeit einer SD-Dienststelle sowie 2 Gestapo-stellen bereits bekannt. Es enthält hochverräterische Angriffe gegen den national-sozialistischen Staat. Ich ersuche, alle katholischen Kirchen auf die Vorlesung hin zu überwachen. Soweit die Kundgebung bereits im Druck erschienen ist, sind alle außerhalb der Kirchen und Pfarrhöfe greifbaren Exemplare zu beschlagnahmen. Soweit Personen außerhalb der Kirchen und Pfarrhöfe Druckschriften verteilen und es sich nicht um Geistliche handelt, sind diese sofort zu verhaften. Ihre Entfernung aus der Partei, ihren Gliederungen und angeschlossenen Verbänden, wie DAF, ferner Handwerkskammern und dergleichen ist sofort zu veranlassen. Sie sind sofort zur strafrechtlichen Aburteilung vor Gericht zu überstellen..."4

Es kam jedoch zu keinerlei Beschlagnahmungen. Da man sich nicht auf Machtkämpfe vor und in jeder Kirche einlassen wollte, wurden nur Privatpersonen verhaftet...“.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------


The tail of Lucifer is very thin, and you have to search it in the infamous interstices of their lies. The same author of this study is telling you the truth the Vatican wants to cover under its dirty lies. He is only showing to you the fear of the Nazi apparatus about a war with the church or Rome: „…Anyway nothing has been seized. As it was necessary to avoid any kind of clash among powers inside and in front of the churches, only private persons went arrested...“ (1). But if the same material actions of the same Nazi apparatus were evidently influenced by the fear to cause a reaction of the church of Rome (read: of the Roman Catholic community of Germany), it means that the Roman Catholic community of Germany had the sufficient political weight, the sufficient social numbers to make the German balance to turn decisively in the opposite direction respect the wishes of Hitler. And if Rome had this power in 1938, it had it also in 1933, only tens of times more strong. But Rome didn’t. The Vatican didn’t use the big weight of its German herd. The priests, the bishops, the thousands of Romanist orders, the thousands of Romanist schools, association, union trades went silenced because they had not to express a strong opposition to the ‘charismatic dictator’ – at the opposite, when possible, they were used to suppress any expression of concrete opposition to the Hitler’s regime which would have appeared among the same Catholics.

-----------------------------------------------------------

Am Palmsonntag konnte dann auch die Enzyklika ohne nennenswerte Störungen vorgetragen werden. In den meisten Pfarreien wurde sie zweigeteilt vorgetragen.

Der erste Teil wurde morgens während der Messe verlesen und der umfangreichere zweite Teil während einer Andacht am Nachmittag oder Abend.

Der Überraschungseffekt gelang sogar dermaßen, daß selbst am Tag nach der Verlesung dem Propagandaministerium immer noch kein Exemplar vorlag. Das Verbot der weiteren Verbreitung kam zu spät.

Am 27. März folgte eine ausführlichere Mitteilung der Gestapo aus der Stapoleitstelle München:
,,Betreff: Päpstliches Rundschreiben über die Lage der Katholischen Kirche im Deutschen Reich. Papst Pius XI. hat an die Erzbischöfe Deutschlands ein Rundschreiben über die Lage der katholischen Kirche im Deutschen Reich erlassen, das bereits am 21. März 1937 von den Kanzeln der Kirche verlesen wurde und in der Zwischenzeit auch im Druck erschienen ist. Da das Rundschreiben hochverräter-ische Angriffe gegen den nationalsozialistischen Staat enthält, wird folgendes angeordnet:
1. Sämtliche außerhalb der Kirchen und Pfarrhöfe greifbaren Exemplare des Rundschreibens sind zu beschlagnahmen. Auch die im Besitz von Privatpersonen vorgefundenen Einzelstücke sind einzuziehen.
Druckschriften, die sich in Händen von Geistlichen befinden, werden von dieser Maßnahme nicht berührt.
2. Sämtliche Personen, die sich mit der Verteilung der Schriften außerhalb der Kirchen und Pfarrhäuser befassen, sind, soweit es sich nicht um Geistliche handelt, sofort festzunehmen und umgehend dem Gericht zur strafrechtlichen Aburteilung zu überstellen. Ihre Entfernung aus der Partei, ihren Gliederungen und ange-schlossenen Verbänden, wie DAF, ferner Handwerkskammer und dergleichen, ist sofort zu veranlassen.
3. Kirchenblätter und kirchliche Amtsblätter, die das Rundschreiben abgedruckt haben, sind zu beschlagnahmen und auf die Dauer von drei Monaten zu verbieten.
4. Druckereien und Verlage, in denen das Rundschreiben hergestellt, bzw. verlegt wurde, sind sofort zu schließen. Die verantwortlichen Personen (Verleger, Drucker, Schriftleiter) sind unverzüglich hierher zu melden, damit von hier aus weitere Maßnahmen gegen sie ergriffen werden können. I.V. gez. Dr. Stepp"5
Die Intervention des Reiches gegen das päpstliche Rundschreiben kam zu spät. In einem Schnellbrief des Reichs- und preußischen Ministers für die kirchlichen Angelegenheiten vom 23. März 1937 heißt es:
,,Das päpstliche Rundschreiben an Erzbischöfe und Bischöfe Deutschlands vom
14. März stellt schwere Verletzung der im Reichskonkordat festgestellten Vereinbarungen dar. Es steht im krassen Widerspruch mit dem Geist des Konkordats und seinen ausdrücklichen Bestimmungen. Das Rundschreiben enthält schwere Angriffe auf das Wohl und Interesse des deutschen Staatswesens. Es versucht, die Autorität der Reichsregierung herabzusetzen, das Wohl des deutschen Staats-wesens nach außen zu schädigen und vor allen Dingen durch den unmittelbaren Appell des Vertragspartners der Reichsregierung an die katholischen Staatsbürger den inneren Frieden der Volksgemeinschaft zu gefährden. Für derartiges feindseliges Verhalten bietet das Reichskonkordat keine Freistatt. Es wird weder durch seinen Geist noch durch die ausdrücklichen Bestimmungen gedeckt. Daher werden den Bischöfen und sonstigen Ordinarien unter Berufung auf Artikel 16 des Reichs-konkordates Druck, Vervielfältigung und Vertreibung Rundschreibens in jeder Form verboten. In Vertretung H. MUHS" 6

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

So it is also possible to understand why the encyclical was issued developing it from a public pastoral letter. Please, read again an excerpt from the initial part of this study, and read what Herbert Immenkötter told:

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Daraufhin lud der Kardinalssekretär Pacelli im Auftrag des Papstes im Januar 1937 drei deutsche Kardinalerzbischöfe und zwei Bischöfe nach Rom ein.1 Unter ihnen befand sich auch Erzbischof Kardinal Michael von Faulhaber, der ausersehen war, den Text dieses Rundschreibens zu verfassen.
Herbert Immenkötter schreibt: ,,Für diese Aufgabe schien er bestens gerüstet: seit einer persönlichen Zusammenkunft mit Hitler acht Wochen zuvor hatte er im Weihnachtshirtenbrief und dann in einem Referat für die Fuldaer Bischofskonferenz die kirchliche Entwicklung der jüngsten Zeit sorgfältig analysiert und ohne Beschönigung kommentiert."2 Drei Tage später legte er diesen Entwurf schon vor, der dann später von Pacelli als Enzyklika ,,Mit brennender Sorge" überarbeitet und erweitert wurde. Die Enzyklika trägt das Datum des 14.
März 1937.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Herbert Immenkötter told that “…for this task (the writing of the papal letter), the best man was him (Faulhaber): after a personal meeting of archbishop Faulhaber with Adolph Hitler occurred eight weeks before he (Faulhaber) carefully and without embellishment analysed in the Christmas pastoral letter and in a report for the Bishop Conference in Fulda the evolution of the church during the early age…”. It is precisely from this particular that you can understand the reason why the Gestapo wasn’t able to get the encyclical issued in thousands of copies under the form of a papal circular letter: because they were absolutely not interested to get it, they just have got it.

The Gestapo, the Sicherheit Dienst, Heydrich, Himmler, Hitler, the Nazi elite knew well the content of the encyclical well before it went spread and read on the 27th March Sunday of the Palms. They knew the content of the future encyclical precisely in the same moment when the encyclical went previously issued under the public, open and accessible to everyone shape of a “pastoral Christmas letter” and of a “report for the Fulda’s bishops conference” which was not read in a secret meeting but in a legally authorized by the concordat meeting. It is a sign of mental insanity to be not aware that everything issued by a whatever kind of organization, association, community in Nazified Germany, was strictly monitored, analysed, tested and screened. Should have the Gestapo boss Heydrik looked at that “Christmas pastoral letter”, written by a man who met the ‘greatest son of Germany’ (I ask pardon to Bismarck for the blasphemy), a man – bishop Faulhaber - who was a very important hierarch of the same theocratic state with which the same ‘charismatic dictator/greatest son’ signed an epochal international agreement (the concordat), a man that issued that “pastoral letter” eight months after that meeting, so, should have Heydrich considered all that as a sort of disturb coming from the idle agents of his intelligence, who had nothing to do in order to kill the boredom than to spy the Romanist bishops in Germany?

The high hierarch of the Romanist theocratic state, the bishop Faulhaber, met the ‘charismatic dictator’ of Germany eight weeks before to issue the “Christmas pastoral letter” not only to have sufficient information from their first agent in Germany regarding the ideological and political situation of every social layer of the country, especially regards to the Protestant layer which was not totally under the Romanist control (as it is today) and so many information about it could have been gained only through the formally ‘secular’ (2) organization of the Romanist mercenaries, i.e. the National Socialist party, but, moreover, to communicate to their highest ‘charismatic’ agent in Berlin about the way he will be informed on the contents of the next encyclical, an encyclical which had to appear incognito under the deceptive shape of a “Christmas pastoral letter”.

And it was important to insert the Faulhaber’s Christmas pastoral letter in the report to the German bishops Conference in Fulda, because it was important to understand their reactions respect the future encyclical and their inner, deep true attitude toward the ‘charismatic dictator’ of Germany. The generals of the Vatican army, before the most important battle of the last five centuries, had to be examined by their Jesuit masters.


The Sicherheit Dienst, the Gestapo but it is quite believable that any other kind of conventional police force too, could have been informed about that letter, even the civil administrations managing permissions and authorizations related the spreading of the press, would have then informed their ‘charismatic dictator’ about the “pastoral letter” and so about the decisions of his Jesuit master related the contents of the next incoming ‘Anti-nazi’ encyclical. Hitler, like a diligent agent, once informed through this not-conventional way about the next incoming plan of the Jesuits, should have then adapted himself and his party to the encyclical of his Romanist masters, giving to his intelligence and Gestapo the opportune orders in order then, when the encyclical would be ‘suddenly’ appeared, to stage a ‘defeat’ of his intelligence the same. If you analyse the orders given by the Gestapo to its agents, you see that they were aimed – by a side - to stage the theatrical play of the “fight between the National Socialist party and the church of Rome”, by the other side to prevent any kind of effective action by their agents – under the alibi to avoid a “Machtkampf” aka a “War among powers”: “…1. All the copies of the circular (the encyclical) at disposition outside the churches and parishes have to be seized. Also the single copies in the hands of the private people have to be seized.

Printed works in the hands of the clergy, are not submitted to this disposition…” (3).

It seems that later, when the Nazi apparatus started to aim its repressive arm against Catholic schools and orders, they didn’t have all this care and fear when they putted under trial hundreds of Romanist priests and then sent them in the Lager. But for the reasons, we’ll see them later. So Heydrich, at the opposite of his ‘charismatic’ boss who expressed the formal intention to “squeeze the church like a toad”, feared the reaction of the Romanist priests. But, really speaking, he and his boss Hitler feared mostly the danger to put obstacles to the spreading of the same encyclical. Because meanwhile the true agents of that spreading, the Romanist priests, weren’t touched by the Gestapo dispositions, at the opposite the “Privatpersonen”, the common people in other words, could be arrested and heavy measures could have been taken against them. So the above disposition number 1, meanwhile was absolutely un-effective as regard the stopping of the knowledge about the papal circular letter, was very effective in instigating the people against the National Socialist power behind the directive, pushing so also the not interested people to get a copy of the encyclical. In fact the best way to arise a great interest in something is usually obtained with a (false, fake, spectacular and as regard the concrete effects un-effective) persecution: „…Anyway nothing has been seized. As it was necessary to avoid any kind of clash among powers inside and in front of the churches, only private persons went arrested....(….)…… The first part (of the papal circular letter/encyclical) was read at the morning during the Mass and the bigger second part was read in the afternoon or evening…” (4). The Romanist priest who had the task to spread the encyclical weren’t touched and they could do their job without any kind of disturb – coherently with the Gestapo’s directive. But the arrested and intimidated “Privatpersonen” added fuel to the interest for the content of the encyclical and so dragged all kind of people to hear about it in the afternoon reading.

About this plan only part of the high level ruling elite of the Nazi apparatus was aware. Low and medium levels were totally kept in ignorance on what was going on. This is not much but it is sure. “Compartimentalization” and agents kept in ignorance about the work done by their near sector of the security services was and is a common feature of any kind of intelligence. “Always uses the good faith actions of your unaware agents to pursue goals which are outside their knowledge and consciousness” is a rule ‘sanctified’ and transformed in founding dogmatic pillar of the same religious sect to which Faulhaber belonged. The Council of Trent putted it under the formal shape of the Canon 32.

So the diligent Nazi agents, working automatically like many Pavlovian dogs, pushed forward without realizing the Jesuits’ avalanche they the same were creating –having been deceived by their the same commanders! The little ball of snow shaped by the hands of Faulhaber after the meeting with his agent Adolph, grew with the indefatigable work of Pacelli and, under the surveillance of the Jesuits masters, now was ready to crash on the entire Roman Catholic community of Germany and on the entire country. Again Faulhaber was ready to stage another role, the role of the man who “takes on himself all the charges for the action”:

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Am 3. April.1937 übernimmt Erzbischof Kardinal Faulhaber die Verantwortung für das Rundschreiben in einem Brief an Herrn Dr. Valentin Mayer, Druckerei Höfling-München:
,,Für die strafrechtlichen Verhandlungen über das päpstliche Rundschreiben vom 14.März 1937 (Lage der katholischen Kirche im Deutschen Reich) erkläre ich, daß der Auftrag zur Drucklegung und zur Verlesung des Rundschreibens in den Kirchen meiner Erzdiäzöse von mir gegeben wurde und das Begleitschreiben an die Seelsorgstellen, das über die Verlesung nähere Anweisungen erteilte, mit meinem vollen Namen gezeichnet ist. Damit habe ich die moralische Verantwortung übernommen, wenn das Rundschreiben wirklich strafrechtliche Nachspiele haben sollte. In dem Maße, in dem ich die Verantwortung übernehme, will ich den Drucker entlasten, der in gutem Glauben einen Druckauftrag ausführen konnte, weil er keine polizeiliche Zensurstelle bildet, und der von der Minute ab, in der ihm das Verbot der Geheimen Staatspolizei bekannt wurde, kein einziges Stück mehr druckte. Ebenso will ich die braven Arbeiter entlasten, die sich in keiner Weise bewußt waren, etwas Unrechtes zu tun und deshalb nach gesundem Rechtsempfinden nicht gestraft werden können. Ich ermächtige Sie, sehr geehrter Herr Doktor, von dieser Erklärung jeden Ihnen gut scheinenden Gebrauch zu machen.
München, 3. April 1937, gez. Kardinal Faulhaber, Erzbischof von München"7
Faulhabers Brief half der Druckerei jedoch nicht:
,,14. Juni 1937. Betrifft: Einziehung volks- und staatsfeindlichen Vermögens; hier Buchdruckerei und Verlag Valentin Höfling in München, Lämmleinstr. 1 (Inhaber: Dr. Valentin Mayer). Beschluß:
Auf Grund des §1 Abs.1 des Gesetzes über die Einziehung kommunistischen Vermögens vom 26. Mai 1933 (RGBl. X. S. 293) in Verbindung mit dem Gesetz vom 14. Juli 1933 (RGBl.I, S.479) über die Einziehung volks- und staatsfeindlichen Vermögens und der ministerialen Bekanntmachung vom 19. September 1933
Nr. 3862 a 133, wird hiermit das gesamte Vermögen der Firma Buchdruckerei und Verlag Valentin Höfling in München, Lämmerstr. 1 - Inhaber Dr. Valentin Mayer in München, Potsdamerstr. 5 - unter Bestätigung der Beschlagnahmung am 11. Juni 1937 auf Grund §1 der VO des Herrn Reichspräsidenten zum Schutz von Volk und Staat vom 28. Februar 1933 (RGBl. I, S. 83) zugunsten des Landes Bayern eingezogen. gez. Christmann"8
Im August 1937 folgte noch eine weitere Maßnahme gegen den Drucker:
,,Der Präsident der Reichspressekammer. (Einschreiben mit Rückschein)
Betreff: Verlag Valentin Höfling, München, Lämmerstr. 1
Unter Bezugnahme auf den Erlaß des Herrn Reichsministers des Innern vom 25. Mai 1937 schließe ich Sie hiermit auf Grund des § 10 der I. Verordnung zur Durchführung des Reichskultukammergetzes vom 1. November 1933 (RGBl. I/1933 S. 797ff.) wegen mangelnder Zuverlässigkeit und Eignung mit sofortiger Wirkung aus der Reichspressekammer aus und untersage Ihnen jede weiter pressemäßige Betätigung. (Siegel) Im Auftrag: gez. Dr. Richter"9
Das vom Papst angestrebte Ziel, nämlich die Abwehr von Mißverständnissen, Abgrenzung von der nationalsozialistischen Lehre, Solidarisierung aller Gläubigen sowie Ermutigung und Stärkung des Abwehrwillens waren jedoch in hohem Maße erreicht.

Um aber die Kirche ebenfalls zur Rechenschaft zu ziehen, ohne sich auf einen Machtkampf einlassen zu müssen, befahl Hitler am 06. April 1937 die Wieder-aufnahme der Sittlichkeitsprozesse und deren propagandistische Vermarktung. Damit jedoch begnügte er sich nicht. Im Mai 1937 entwarf Hitler selbst ein Konzept, wie der Vernichtungsfeldzug gegen die Kirche zu Ende geführt werden müsse. In fünf Schritten sollte die Kirche gebeugt und dem nationalsozialistischen Staat zum Diener gemacht werden.

Beseitigung des Zölibats

Enteignung des Kirchenvermögens

Erschwerter Zugang zum Theologiestudium

Auflösung aller Orden und Klöster

Verbot der Erziehung durch kirchliche Personen

In einer langen Reihe von Schauprozessen wurden Hunderte von katholischen Ordensbrüdern und Geistlichen wegen angeblicher Sittlichkeits- und Devisen-vergehen abgeurteilt. Die Propaganda sprach die niedrigsten Instinkte einer sensationslüstigen Masse an, um die katholische Geistlichkeit zu verunglimpfen und das Ansehen der katholischen Kirche zu schädigen. Hunderte von katholischen Geistlichen wanderten in Konzentrationslager. Klöster und Klosterschulen wurden ebenso wie eine Reihe von Theologischen Hochschulen und Fakultäten geschlossen. Dies wurde vor allem in der Reaktionen der Nationalsozialisten in der Frage des Schulkampfes deutlich. Der Kirchenkampf ging in dieser heftigen Form weiter, bis der von Hitler entfesselte Krieg ihm wenigstens äußerlich ein Ende bereitete.

------------------------------------------------------------------------



But just a month later, the ‘charismatic dictator’ decided it was the time to stop the “extermination war on the church”:

“… In May 1937 the same Hitler developed the dispositions about the way on how to stop the annihilation war against the church…” (5). With five points regarding the prohibition to teach students by the clergy, the elimination of the celibacy, the seizing of the wealth of the church, the arising of obstacles to the access to theological studies and the loosing of orders and monasteries, the same monster, the creature of the Jesuit dr. Frankenstein, affirmed to not be his son. So the planned Vatican crusade for the annihilation of the greatest number of ‘heretics’ in Eurasia, and to change for ever for the benefit of Rome the religious map of Europe, could start without no one suspecting about the true dark inspirer of the incoming largest genocide in the human history.


But the ones who feared the most a possible „Machtkampf” or a clash among powers - the “Third Reich government vs. the Holy see” clash, were not Hitler and his minions, but the church of Rome. Again the figure of Hitler seems to be used as a sort of multipurpose actor, who, during his career as physical Fuehrer and later in the costumes of his manipulated historical figure, expresses – through ‘scientific’ researches – the goals, the wishes, the fears of his Romanist masters: “…ohne sich auf einen Machtkampf einlassen zu müssen…” – “…without to let himself to be dragged in a war among powers…”.

This sentence shows the difficulties in keeping the oppression of the Nazi apparatus on the Roman Catholic community firmly under the level over which it would have caused an open riot of the same Catholics against the Hitler’s regime. A precision work. An open riot/opposition would have meant from one side the urgency of Rome to oppress openly the same her community. From the other side it would have constrained Rome to follow, even if only apparently, the open rioting/opposition of the German Catholics, in order to not appear the supporter of Hitler’s dictatorship. And, as final consequence feared by Rome no more or less like a vampire is terrorized by the holy water and the crosses, to chose an apparent condemnation of the Hitler’s regime would have constrained Rome to openly attack in a decisive and not ambiguous way her ‘charismatic dictator’ of Germany the same. And all that meanwhile she was doing her best efforts to appear ‘hostage’ of Hitler. Dr. Frankestein would have been constrained to destroy his the same creature meanwhile she was still lying on his surgical bed in his laboratory: a nightmare for Rome.

After having seen the behaviour of the church of Rome, if I was a Roman Catholic, I would think that my divine emperor of Rome is not the vicarious of Christ, but the Vicarious of Satan. Satan the lord of lies. After having taken knowledge of the Hitler’s five points you could well affirm that the Roman Catholic church in Germany has been not kneeled (“gebeugt”), but simply annihilated. With those acts Hitlers destroyed the concordat. Because the same Jesuits wanted to destroy that piece of paper which was nothing else than an alibi. The Jesuits understood very well that powerful historical figures like the one of Bismarck cannot be destroyed with a direct attack. Their Sun Tzu manual teaches that you have to drag away from your enemies the sympathy, and as in the case of Bismarck and the Kulturkampf this was impossible to do with the usual calumniation and false flag attacks which would immediately have suggested the true occult mastermind. The only way was the building of a sort of ‘sosia’ of the Protestant Iron Kanzler. And then to use the same words of the Protestant enemy but aimed no more against the Vatican and its Jesuits, but against a third part, on which to drag and to focuse the attention and the feelings of the Germans. Substitute the word with an initial “J” with another, completely different, always starting with “J”. This is the core of the Hitler’s rhetorical Nazi propaganda. So the Jews went persecuted also to weaken the historical consciousness of the Protestants (and of the honest Roman Catholics) about the true German and European question, the “Jesuit Question”. And doing this firstly confusing it with the “Jewish Question” (6), then submerging it with the material “Fight against the perfidous Jews”, to finally drown it in the darkness of the collective oblivion of the German people who, once, was well aware that the true deadly enemy for Germany was not coming from Jerusalem, but from Rome.

Is the same man that clearly and strongly affirmed that “the church of Rome was a toad to be squeezed” who helped that toad to survive in the homeland of Luther with a concordat. I ask myself, why he didn’t sign a concordat with the “rats to be squeezed” too, the Jewish Rabbis? Was for real the Romanist church in the hands of Hitler? Till the point he granted her a concordat? Following the conveniences Hitler in a moment becomes a very powerful man who keeps at his willing the church of Rome with a gun at her temple – in another moment he is depicted like a man fearing the Catholic counterpart when he is not able to stop the ‘firm condemn’ of his regime by the church of Rome. On the other front the Vatican legitimises its power and especially its presence in Germany basing that on his great influence, but at the same time it is not able to use that ‘power’ and that ‘great influence’ to stop the same dictator who – guess what - fears that power and great influence the same! How is it possible to term all that? I name it: a farce. A Nazi-Vatican, Jesuit farce.

The concordat that the ‘charismatic dictator’ of Germany granted to Rome has been signed having in mind its the same later destruction. Hitler squeezed the concordat in order to not squeeze the church of Rome, because he had to show that he was a ‘real enemy’ of Vatican and of the Jesuits just in the precise moment he was going to realize the secret goals of his ‘real enemies’, the final secret, theological, Inquisitorial cleaning of Eurasia – and the definitive destruction of Prussia.

So, for more than seventy years, we lived in an ocean of lies. The enmity of Bismarck towards the Whore of Rome and its Jesuits had to be destroyed shadowing it first with a more noisy, artificial and theatrical ‘enmity’ of the ‘charismatic dictator’ towards….. the same Roman Catholics who didn’t forget the historical truth of the real Public Enemy N.1 of Germany, the evil Jesuit order expelled in the previous century. You have only to read the reports of the Gestapo and their bosses to understand the care they putted in order to make them sound “Kulturkampf”. Again Jesuits used the weapon of their enemies to destroy them. But before to start the final war of religious cleaning of Eurasia, they had to clean away all the ‘enemies within’. Before to start a war (a religious war), the army have to be cleaned from all the possible inner saboteurs. So all the doubtful and suspect battalions which could take the side of the enemy once on the battlefield, have to be loosed. And again their ‘charismatic dictator’ and his party, the secular glove to hide the Loyola’s hand, did the dirty job: „…In a long sequence of public spectacular trials, hundreds of clergymen belonging to orders and priests cause their alleged violation of the moral values went putted under judgement… (….)…. Hundreds of Catholic priests went in concentration camps. Monastries and monastic schools as many theological high school and faculties were closed….“ (7).

The Jesuits now, just one year before the start of the final part of their II Thirty Years war (1914 – 1945) could well close a good part of their theological Romanist apparatus in Germany. Now, for at least seven years, they’ll have no more need of it. No more need of ideological deceptions, of political plots, of subtle propaganda and of economical tampering of the cursed homeland of the cursed Luther. The fire, the blade and the genocidal mass murder will have done the dirty job for seven years against their ‘heretic’ enemies of Germany and Eurasia. So they could well ‘sacrifice’ during those ‘wonderful’ seven years, some pieces of their Romanist theological intellectual machine.



The orders and association inside the same Romanist church who were the most warm, silent enemies of the Jesuits the same went destroyed under the alibi of the tyrannical Hitler’s regime. Roman Catholic organizations and orders ‘infected’ by the Lutheran thought since long time in the Jesuits’ purges list, went closed & terminated. Adolph didn’t sent to the Konzentration Lager the most warm Romanist priest supporter of his regime, this is sure. And neither touched the author of the starting core of the ‘anti-nazi’ encyclical – bishop Faulhaber who served the Antichrist in Rome as archbishop of Munich from 1917 to 1952.

Is it still tolerable today to hear the cries of a Vatican which, meanwhile was complaining to be ‘hostage’ of the ‘charismatic dictator’ of Germany, was seen by the same Adolph Hitler as a powerful organization able to smash down his the same dictatorship? The true answer to this question has not to be given by any ‘scientific’, ‘authoritative’, ‘official’ commission, be it a Vatican one, an ‘ecumenical’ one or one among the hundreds and thousands of ‘secular’ academic commissions built up by ‘experts’. This is no matter of dogmas and no one has the power on his earth to change the judgement of a conscience, especially the ones who pretend to be the ‘vicarious’ of Jesus – really speaking they are only vicarious of Satan, their Lord of the Lies.


What happened that Sunday of the Palms in all the Romanist churches of the Third Reich, has been told in that famous documentary about the Hitlerian ‘oppression’ on the church of Rome in Germany I told about in my previous message (8) . The deeper reason for the contradictory disposition of the Gestapo are now even more clear. All the priests in service that day read the encyclical. Every German Roman Catholic present heard about the allusive condemnation of the National Socialist regime by the papacy. Every German Roman Catholic who was a true Christian and an opponent to the Hitler’s regime learned that his pope was on his side and not on the Hitler’s side. Every German Roman Catholic who was a true Christian, an opponent to the Hitler’s regime and had a sufficient courage to not lie to himself and to his neighbour in those hard times, with that encyclical was invited to expose him/herself as an opponent to the National Socialist regime. How many Jesuits’ agents, Vatican and Gestapo spies were ready in the Romanist churches and outside them, hidden among the Catholic herd, on the workplaces and in the cultural Roman Catholic circles, ready to classify all the Roman Catholic community who was instigated to expose outside at the light of the sun his true attitude toward the Ledochowsky’s ‘charismatic dictator’ of Germany? How many priests who read that encyclical helped to detect among their believers the opponents to the Vatican Socialist regime? How many informers and delators entered in action the sequent days, months and years, with their ears well opened in order to capture among the Roman Catholics of Germany the least whispering caused by the impressive encyclical? How many reports went filed about the Roman Catholics who opposed to the papal National Socialist party and his Inquisitorial regime? With the order given through that contradictory disposition to their agents to seize every possible copy of the papal circular letter containing the encyclical outside the churches, Gestapo, the ‘charismatic dictator’ and his party, the Jesuits, wanted absolutely to avoid that the people could read the encyclical in their home, just after having picked up the leaflets taken outside the churches. When the people was shacked inside the soul after having heard or read those sentences, the Romanist priests, the true disguised Gestapo agents, the Sicherheit Dienst and SS agents, and the Jesuits present in the churches, should have captured the least emerging sentiment coming from the inner deep soul of the Romanist herd, and detected the true inner sentiments of every single sheep of their herd.

Does require to you a great intellectual effort to understand that with your open response to that encyclical, you could determine your destiny when the war started? Stalingrad instead Paris, Rome instead the Sahara. A sure death instead a possibility to survive. Finally Rome could have the revenge on his the same ‘beloved’ herd. If the encyclical pushed you to oppose to their Hitlers, it means that you fell in the Vatican trap: if you didn’t believe that were the Jews or the Communists the threat it means that you were still supporting the old Bismarck Kulturkampf which fought the only true infected poniard stuck in the core of Germany: the Order of Loyola. That encyclical was only a tool in the hands of the Jesuits for the religious cleaning among their herd the same. Millions of Roman Catholics, who were true German patriots and opposed to the greatest traitor of Germany coming from Austria, after being classified by the Gestapo and by the Jesuits, weren’t sent to the concentration camps. No, they were first exploited to slaughter other ‘heretics’ all along Eurasia, And then, at the end, when the job was nearly to be completed, they the same went butchered in the frozen steppes of Russia under the lead of the secret brother of their ‘charismatic dictator’, the Jesuit priest, Roman Catholic Joseph Stalin. Or burned alive under the phosphorus of the allied bombings, whose targets could have been well communicated by an organization present on both fronts of the war, the organization of the church of Rome. Wasn’t the Roman Catholic grandfather of the today biggest Italian party leader Walter Veltroni, the monarchic Yugoslavia ambassador to the Holy See Ciril Kotnik, in contact with both the collaborationist Nazi-priest of occupied Slovenia and the exiled Monarchic Yugoslav government in London? Or you are lying also to yourself and you don’t admit that if for real the true intention of Pacelli was the fight against the(ir) ‘charismatic dictator’ of Germany, he shouldn’t have to act in such a manner that would have exposed to the Hitler’s butchers the most warm opponents to National Socialism belonging to his Catholic herd, pushing them to a sure death? The answer is only one, because Pacelli and Ledochowsky wanted to exterminate all the Roman Catholics who were opponents to the(ir) ‘charismatic dictator’ of Germany and so to their ‘Kampf’ to exterminate the Kulturkampf and the Protestantism from North Europe. Today, A.D. 2008, they are near to reach the objective, with a nearly totally de-Christianized East Germany and former Prussia and a totally confused, chaotic, Islamized Germany. For this reason, 70 years ago, they brought forth that kind of Vatican toilette paper on which they spread the lying faeces of the Antichrist and named it: “Mit brennender Sorge”. The “Sorge” evacuated from the intestine of their lord, Lucifer. That stinking “brennende Sorge” is the proof which shows that Hitler was not a mad man who took mad decisions in the war, because he was doing another secret war, hidden under the ‘official’ war. The Catholic caporal of Austria simply executed the orders of his master, the General Superior Wladimir Ledochowsky, and dedicated himself and the SS to pursue with lucidity and awareness a secret, not declared war whose goal was to cause the greatest number of German, ‘heretic’ Protestant or ‘deviated’ Catholic human losses. Beheading once for all the same German spirit who united in 1872 both Catholics and Protestants against the Romanist Whore.


Pacelli and Ledochowsky had to do all that keenly. First they built their guillotine named: National Socialism. Then, betraying and deceiving their the same herd about the true nature of that strange machine, they succeeded in dragging their unaware ‘beloved’ Catholic German herd in the same building yard of that machine and then to put their head under its blade. The sad history of the ‘Christian’ aka Roman Catholic party in Germany teaches you on how the Catholic herd caged in their Jesuitical party collaborated discretely to the rising of the ‘charismatic dictator’. Then, after they were sure that nothing could have demolished that machine and that the millions of Catholics were strongly tied with their head under the blade, they instigated their ‘beloved’ herd to expose their inner deep sentiment towards the same final construction. And then, the ‘charismatic’ Roman Catholic guillotine of Germany could start to work at full regime, without pause, for seven years. In Russia, in Africa, in the forests of Yugoslavia, in the cold waters of the Atlantic ocean, and in the hundreds of Dresden putted at the stake by the Inquisitorial aerial fire.


Pacelli and Ledochowsky should be treated exactly as it was used to do by their the same ancestor popes in their beloved Romanist Middle Age. Sanctification? Their chariots should be dragged away from their graves and hanged in Saint Peter square - exactly just like the old Roman Catholic popes did to their previous competitors - in order that their last rests could be finally devoured by the worms and insects. The ghosts of eighty millions of butchered ‘heretics’ in their Second Thirty Years war (1914 – 1945) are crying for that. But I think that we don’t need to take those chariots from the holes where they are lying, imitating their bloody ancestors. It is sufficient to know that the souls of Ledochowsky and Pacelli are burning for ever in the Hell.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notes


(1) “…Es kam jedoch zu keinerlei Beschlagnahmungen. Da man sich nicht auf Machtkämpfe vor und in jeder Kirche einlassen wollte, wurden nur Privatpersonen verhaftet...“.


(2) ….’secular’ and apparently ‘anti-Catholic’, appearing so ‘worthy of trust’ at the eyes of the same Protestants who then would have had no difficulties to confide their anti-Romanist, eventually anti-Jesuit feelings to their Nazi comrades/spies of Jesuits.


(3). “....1. Sämtliche außerhalb der Kirchen und Pfarrhöfe greifbaren Exemplare des Rundschreibens sind zu beschlagnahmen. Auch die im Besitz von Privatpersonen vorgefundenen Einzelstücke sind einzuziehen.
Druckschriften, die sich in Händen von Geistlichen befinden, werden von dieser Maßnahme nicht berührt...“.


(4) “…Es kam jedoch zu keinerlei Beschlagnahmungen. Da man sich nicht auf Machtkämpfe vor und in jeder Kirche einlassen wollte, wurden nur Privatpersonen verhaftet....(....).... Der erste Teil wurde morgens während der Messe verlesen und der umfangreichere zweite Teil während einer Andacht am Nachmittag oder Abend....“


(5) „….Im Mai 1937 entwarf Hitler selbst ein Konzept, wie der Vernichtungsfeldzug gegen die Kirche zu Ende geführt werden müsse…“.


(6) The “Jewish Question” or how Jesuits and Vatican created it (the “Jewish Question” is a term used in the XIX century in the “La Civiltà Cattolica” Jesuit magazine) in Poland, pushing for the enmity between Jews and Roman Catholic Polish people in the previous three decades to prepare the field for the future incoming theological cleaning of Poland by Hitler and Stalin – see my third comment about Poland on Wlodimir Ledochowski's Masonic Tool FDR message of Douglas Willinger's CCR blog:

http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2008/11/wlodimir-ledochowski-masonic-tool-fdr.html


(7). “…In einer langen Reihe von Schauprozessen wurden Hunderte von katholischen Ordensbrüdern und Geistlichen wegen angeblicher Sittlichkeits- und Devisen-vergehen abgeurteilt... (....) ...Hunderte von katholischen Geistlichen wanderten in Konzentrationslager. Klöster und Klosterschulen wurden ebenso wie eine Reihe von Theologischen Hochschulen und Fakultäten geschlossen.....“.


(8) See the message of Saturday, August 23, 2008“The miserable buffoonery of the “church of Rome ‘victim’ of Hitler”:

http://avlesbeluskesexposed.blogspot.com/2008/08/miserable-buffoonery-of-church-of-rome.html



-------------------------------------------------
(As I have no time, no resources, no money, no support at disposition, it is clear that what I wrote is affected by many errors and uncorrectness. I am not a prostitute lay journalist of this dirty Vatican 'tollerant' regime called 'democracy'. I have not the 51% of the Bank of America supporting my writings. I don't control the Casinò of Ostenda and neither Citroen and Peugeot as the General Superior did at least in 1958. So corrections and additions could appear in the future)

I - How Rome controlled her 'charismatic' dictators

>

Part two

Remember that the best way to control her dictators was, for the Romish church, to put them at the power and then to push 'em against the Roman Catholic population of their countries. Once Himmler and Hitler (I too believe as said in the site http://one-evil.org/, that Himmler was over Hitler) got the absolute power then Rome agitated against them the Roman Catholic basis (von Galen, Mit brennnender Sorge, etc.) in order to make appear to 'em clear that Rome had in the hands the keys to control the unity of the country and hence to obtain in this way a docile obedience - for this reason it is important to publish here some old messages appeared in my ABE blog:

Friday, November 14, 2008

“Mit brennender Sorge”: the words of Satan under a ‘christian’ disguise? – part one

URL: http://avlesbeluskesexposed.blogspot.com/2008/11/mit-brennendem-sorge-words-of-satan.html

The Pacelli’s elaborated 1937 encyclical was not only part of the worst crime committed against the entire humanity, but especially a crime against their the same Roman Catholic herd of Germany.


First part of two

– the second part:

http://avlesbeluskesexposed.blogspot.com/2008/11/mit-brennendem-sorge-words-of-satan_14.html


------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.hausarbeiten.de/faecher/vorschau/95116.html


Titel: Papst Pius` XI. Enzyklika "Mit brennender Sorge" vom 14. März 1937 im Vergleich mit dem Entwurf des Münchener Erzbischofs Kardinal Michael Faulhaber
Autor: Ulli Stegmeyer
Fach: Geschichte - Nationalsozialismus, II. Weltkrieg
Veranstaltung: Hauptseminar: Kirche und Nationalsozialismus
Institution/Hochschule: Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg
Kategorie: Hauptseminararbeit
Jahr: 1998
Seiten: 16
Sprache: Deutsch
Dateigröße: 79 KB
Archivnummer: V95116
ISBN: 978-3-638-07795-8

VolltextOtto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg
Lehrstuhl: Kirchengeschichte
Dozent: Prof. Dr. Georg Denzler
Hauptseminar: Kirche und Nationalsozialismus

Thema der Arbeit: Papst Pius` XI. Enzyklika ,,Mit brennender Sorge" vom 14. März 1937 im Vergleich mit dem Entwurf des Münchener Erzbischofs Kardinal Michael Faulhaber

Verfasserin: Ulli Stegmeyer
08. Semester, Realschullehramt Deutsch/Geschichte
ulli.stegmeyer@unicum.de

Inhalt:
1. Einleitung 2
2. Die Entstehung der Enzyklika ,,Mit brennender Sorge" 2
3. Die Folgen der Enzyklika 3
4. Die Endfassung der Enzyklika 7
5. Die Enzyklika im Vergleich mit dem Entwurf Faulhabers 9
5.1. Die Einleitungen - Unterschiede und Übereinstimmungen 9
5.2. Die Bibelzitate 9
5.3. Die Rolle des Reichskonkordats 10
5.4. Der reine Gottglaube 11
5.5. Der ,,Höhepunkt der Offenbarung" im Evangelium Jesu Christi 11
5.6. Der Kirchenglaube 12
5.7. Die Umdeutung heiliger Worte und Begriffe 12
5.8 Die sieben religiösen Grundbegriffe: Offenbarung, Glaube, Unsterblichkeit, Erbsünde, Kreuz, Demut und Gnade 13
5.9. An die Jugend 14
6. Schlußbetrachtung 15

Literaturnachweis 16


1. Einleitung
1937 brach der Kampf zwischen dem Hitler-Regime und der katholischen Kirche aus. Schon vorher gab es Konflikte, da Hitler und seine Partei sich nicht durch das Reichskonkordat gebunden sahen, und es somit zu Verletzungen der kirchlichen Befugnisse kam. Trotz politischer Übergriffe versuchte die Kirche lange einen offenen Kampf zu vermeiden.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------


As the Roman Catholic church – in the effort to destroy and then to rebuild as its slave the Protestant Germany - the ugly mother of the National Socialism was, she had to push away the evidence of the direct link with its creature, and a public, largely advertised, apparently exhibited in front of the eyes of all the world ‘war’ with her evil son the same, was the better mean to cancel the suspects. But the Jesuits learned well the James Whale’s movie and they would have not fallen in the same error of the dr. Frankenstein who was blamed for having created the monster. So before to start the final and the most bloody part of the Counter Reformation war in Eurasia, after to have created the National Socialist Inquisitorial sword, the possessor of this sword had to injury himself with its weapon the same, in order to print in the mind not only of the present population but also in the mind of the following future generations, the impressive idea that the hands taking up the National Socialist dagger and, moreover, the creators of the it were not the Vatican ones.

------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Die Entstehung der Enzyklika ,,Mit brennender Sorge"
Da durch das Propagandaministerium die Kirche in den Augen der Gläubigen unglaubwürdig gemacht werden sollte, war es der Kirche nur möglich dem mit regelmäßigen Informationen von kirchlichen Stellen entgegenzuwirken. Durch die Kontrolle des Propagandaministeriums waren der Kirche alle gängigen Informations-wege verwehrt. Ein päpstliches Rundschreiben konnte also nur unter strengster Geheimhaltung verfaßt werden.
Daraufhin lud der Kardinalssekretär Pacelli im Auftrag des Papstes im Januar 1937 drei deutsche Kardinalerzbischöfe und zwei Bischöfe nach Rom ein.1 Unter ihnen befand sich auch Erzbischof Kardinal Michael von Faulhaber, der ausersehen war, den Text dieses Rundschreibens zu verfassen.
Herbert Immenkötter schreibt: ,,Für diese Aufgabe schien er bestens gerüstet: seit einer persönlichen Zusammenkunft mit Hitler acht Wochen zuvor hatte er im Weihnachtshirtenbrief und dann in einem Referat für die Fuldaer Bischofskonferenz die kirchliche Entwicklung der jüngsten Zeit sorgfältig analysiert und ohne Beschönigung kommentiert."2 Drei Tage später legte er diesen Entwurf schon vor, der dann später von Pacelli als Enzyklika ,,Mit brennender Sorge" überarbeitet und erweitert wurde. Die Enzyklika trägt das Datum des 14. März 1937.
Schon zwei Tage später erhielten alle deutschen Bischöfe ein gedrucktes Exemplar, das ihnen über Kuriere der Nuntiatur überbracht worden war. Dieses Rund-schreiben wurde am 21. März 1937, am Palmsonntag, verlesen. Sie hatten nur fünf Tage Zeit, um die für ihre Diäzösen benötigten Exemplare herzustellen. Unter größter Geheimhaltung gelang dennoch der Vertrieb von über 300 000 Exemplaren.3

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The National Socialist party had to be informed by its masters of Rome about the instruction on how to bring Europe to the final Inquisitorial butchery. As it was impossible to propose a normal diplomatic link with official messengers and official documents stating the progress in the Counter Reformation war, Rome agreed with its Nazi traitor of Germany and executioners of the Luther’s heritage to pass to them the information under the more impressive and believable method of the spying activity. Two secret brothers engaged in a fake war will never let the public to discover them drinking and talking pleasantly around a table, and the information one knows about the other is always a product of a ‘spying’ activity and not of a normal official exchange of information.

So it was very important in January 1937 to call 3 cardinal archbishops and 2 bishops in Rome in order to give the strong impression of a sort of ‘state of war’ between Hitler and the papacy. Like the Freemasonry: the most it is excommunicated, the most their members are carrying out very important jobs for the sake of the Vatican. Among those 5 generals of the Vatican, the archbishop Faulhaber, a person involved with the Bolshevik riot of Munich (and the man who in 1951 in Munich will consecrate as priest the future Benedict XVI). Notice how these Marxist revolutionary attempts constituted opportune alibis to create the first military core of the later SS and SA corps: those first military squads were the “Freiekorps” (1). So here you have the answer for the quick evolving of the Bolshevik attempts, having the Red insurgency only the secret goal to ignite the rising of the National Socialist army – a pure theatrical role, and after the creation of the first core of the National Socialist organization, the German revolutionary Bolsheviks went suppressed and became only a record in the books of the historians (2).

From historical sources we came to the knowledge that the “Mit Brennender Sorge” encyclical has been developed in consequence of an order Faulhber received in Rome from Pacelli during the meeting with those 5 German cardinal and bishops. For this purpose archbishop Faulhaber developed a Christmas pastoral letter, a letter then transformed in a report for the Bishop Conference in Fulda. And the most interesting thing is that the pastoral letter was written “… after a personal meeting of archbishop Faulhaber with Adolph Hitler occurred eight weeks before…” (3).

Did bishop Faulhaber, before to start the writing of the core of the near future deceptive encyclical, receive suggestions and advertisings from a man who knew well the social situation of Germany? A man with whom Faulhaber was in a secret spiritual communion? A man who, since the end of the WWI (see “suor Pascalina memories” – go to Bavarian nunciature link in note 1) was in confidence with the Bavarian nuncio Pacelli? The Roman Catholic caporal from Austria nested in the once Protestant capital Berlin, was the perfect man from whom to have vital information about the intrigues and secrets of the Nazi ruling elite of Germany, and could have communicated the “state of the art” of the dictatorship.

In fact the pastoral letter / report to the Bishop Conference in Fulda was quickly sent to Pacelli and became the foundation of the famous “Mit Brennender Sorge” encyclical, issued on the 14th March 1937. After further two days, on the 16th March, the encyclical, thanks to the couriers of the nunciature, was putted in the hands of all the Roman Catholic bishops of Germany. They had only 5 days before the date of 21st March in order to copy and spread that strange circular arrived with anxious hurry from Rome in all the German dioceses. The 21st March was the Sunday of the Palms, and all the Roman Catholics of Germany were going to gather together in the churches. Waiting the German Romanist believers, 300,000 copies of the “Mit Brennender Sorge” were lying on the altars of all the Roman Catholic churches in Germany, ready to be read by the priests and so to be heard by ALL the Roman Catholics of Germany. Another Vatican “100 Flowers Campaign” could start.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notes


(1) See the thread on the old The Unhived Mind about the numerological connections among the Nazi-putsch of Munchen, his Nazi-heroes, Faulhaber the bishop of Munchen , his young priest by him consecrated Ratzinger, and the discrete presence of the number 16:

“Benedict The 16th and the 16 Nazi 'Heroes' Of The, Putsch Of Munich

http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=52153

For the general numerological and symbolic occult core of the Vatican sect, see also the “The Saturnalian Brotherhood” section of the The Unhived Mind:

http://z10.invisionfree.com/The_Unhived_Mind_II/index.php?s=6fd4c4d5a41fef03aa38a6b33b2f803d&showforum=48

As the regards the links among the Soviet Republic of Bavaria with the Vatican,…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bavarian_Soviet_Republic

…see the interesting events in a Munich in the hands of the atheist Reds in November 1918, a city and emptied from any kind of diplomatic foreign representatives except…. the Vatican one, the nunciature with the nuncio Pacelli which welcomed a “Catholic caporal of Austria”:

http://www.tuppersaussy.com/museum/html/writings/articles/15brienner.html

“…Came Armistice Day, November 11, 1918, the Reich was devastated . The Kaiser had fled for the safety of Holland.

Power-drunk from overthrowing czarist Russia, Bolshevik mobs flying red flags overran Bavaria. All Munich's diplomatic legations returned to their home countries. The Vatican nunciature alone remained….”. Quoted also in Continuing Counter Reformation blog:

http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2008/10/wlodimir-vladimir-ledochowskis-pius-x.html

Interesting to note how the later “Munich-putsch” or “Beer Hall Putsch” whose “Freikorps” went created as opportune reaction to the Bolshevik threat of five years before (the Soviet Republic of Bavaria), saw archbishop of Munich Faulhaber in a very impeccable and staged role of the ‘third part over the clashing fronts’:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beer_Hall_Putsch

“…There was one member of the cabinet who was not at the Bürgerbräu Keller: Franz Matt, the vice-premier and minister of education and culture. A staunchly conservative Catholic, he was having dinner with the Archbishop of Munich, Cardinal Michael von Faulhaber and the Papal Nuncio to Bavaria, Archbishop Eugenio Pacelli (who would later become Pope Pius XII), when he learned of the putsch. He immediately telephoned von Kahr. When he found the man vacillating and unsure, Matt decisively began plans to set up a rump government-in-exile in Regensburg and composed a proclamation calling upon all police, armed forces, and civil servants to remain loyal to the government….”.

Meanwhile the Freikorps, headed by their Austrian caporal five years before funded by the same Pacelli, were doing a training test for the later 1933 Vatican coup of Hitler, they were directly controlling the most delicate link of their Counter Reformation chain, the same fake and theatrical opposition to the “Beer Hall Putsch”. A Vatican chain which was going to tie the entire Germany to the Jesuits’ stake. And now we can also well understand why archbishop cardinal Faulhaber headed then the "International Catholic League against Antisemitism and Racism Amici Israël" (Corrected later - see below excerpt) from 1925 to 1928, a Romanist league which dragged many converted Jews: as demonstrated four centuries before, with the Huguenots massacre, Rome, before to exterminate the ‘heretics’, usually deceives them with ‘ecumenical magic’. The same Vatican career of Faulhaber, archishop of Munich from 1917 to 1952, a uninterrupted carrer also during the age of the 'charismatic' killer of Jews Hitler, demonstrates too the true occult goals of that international league....

(Corrected 15th November 2008 12:40: of course the true name of the league headed by Faulhaber was not “Catholic anti-Semite League” but "International Catholic League against Antisemitism and Racism Amici Israël"; I added then a further comment: "The same Vatican career of Faulhaber, .....the true occult goals of that international league....")


(2) This is the reason for which, betraying the same ‘theories’ of Karl Marx, in the industrially developed countries of Italy and Germany the ‘proletarian’ revolution failed, meanwhile in the rural Russia it got the power. Because in Italy and in Germany the Bolshevism served only to instigate the reaction which built the Fascism and the National Socialism, in Russia the Bolshevism had to go to the power because there it had not to play a ‘theatrical’ role, but to physically butcher the ‘heretic’ Orthodoxies of Russia – and their anti-Vatican, Byzantine nobility:

“Wlodimir (Vladimir) Ledochowski: Humanity's Worst Criminal- Not only the 3rd Reich but also the U.S.S.R.”

http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2007/08/wlodimir-vladimir-ledochowski-humanitys.html


(3) „…Seit einer persönlichen Zusammenkunft mit Hitler acht Wochen zuvor hatte er im Weihnachtshirtenbrief und dann in einem Referat für die Fuldaer Bischofskonferenz die kirchliche Entwicklung der jüngsten Zeit sorgfältig analysiert und ohne Beschönigung kommentiert…“.

Or:

“…for this task (the writing of the papal letter), the best man was him (Faulhaber): after a personal meeting of archbishop Faulhaber with Adolph Hitler occurred eight weeks before he (Faulhaber) carefully and without embellishment analysed in the Christmas pastoral letter and in a report for the Bishop Conference in Fulda the evolution of the church during the early age…”



-------------------------------------------------
(As I have no time, no resources, no money, no support at disposition, it is clear that what I wrote is affected by many errors and uncorrectness. I am not a prostitute lay journalist of this dirty Vatican 'tollerant' regime called 'democracy'. I have not the 51% of the Bank of America supporting my writings. I don't control the Casinò of Ostenda and neither Citroen and Peugeot as the General Superior did at least in 1958. So corrections and additions could appear in the future)


Saturday, August 13, 2011

Re-founding Lutheranism:...

>


"The Israel-friendly, and Islam-critical weekly newspaper "Norway Today" lost state support."


.......... . . . . . . . . .

"..........................
Our Country sow doubt about Islam-bashing Hallgrim Berg
August 12, 2011

"Hallgrim Berg regret nothing".

Halgrim Berg host
suspicion (?) of Our Country to have been critical of Islam.

"Hallgrim Berg regret nothing".

This is the title of an article in Our Country.

The newspaper is trying to cast an unfortunate light on the Berg, and want readers to think that the former member of parliament from the same ideological vision that Anders Behring Breivik.

This is not appropriate for a newspaper that claims to accommodate all shift patterns Christian.

It seems that the subject is that those who warned against Islam as a religion and ideology, should be brought to the Silence. It is exactly this that is the goal of Sharia law in countries like Iran and Saudi Arabia.

Thus, the word "Islam-bashing" Anders Behring Breivik Islam's best friend in Norway, when he resorts to terror against AUF. This cruel attack turn now back on all forms of competent statements about Islam.

What is it that makes a newspaper that our country to cast doubt on the Right-man Hallgrim Berg?

Our country received 37 million in state aid in 2010. The newspaper is the main mouthpiece for the Norwegian church in the media.

The circulation of our country is about 24,000. The newspaper gets a little over 1500 million in annual funding from the sekulœre State for each daily buyer of the newspaper.

Our Country is not alone, to exist at the mercy of the Norwegian state. Other Christian newspaper in Norway have to watch out, so they are not authority for the state religion in Norway, a watered-down fake version of the Martin Luther once lœrte.

The independent Christian daily newspaper "Day" will receive 13 million in state aid.

Pentecostal movement's weekly newspaper "Victory Cross" received 1.8 million in state aid. There are not many Pentecostals in Norway who are aware of.

The Israel-friendly, and Islam-critical weekly newspaper "Norway Today" lost state support.
It is dangerous to end up in the pocket of the sekulœre the Christian state. It is not easy for editors to resist, when it comes policy guidelines in the form of "requests" to take a settlement with what is not politically correct.

Our-Land's attack on Hallgrim Berg is an example of this. Criticizing Islam, is the Labor-controlled state power viewed as an attack on the multicultural (?) Norway.

This is a short circuit. Islam will never support a multi-cultural Norway as a political goal. In all countries where Muslims have come in the majority, have yttringsfridom and democracy has been abolished. Islam will be adopted as the state religion, and only Muslims have the right to rule.

Also, the Labor-controlled state church will rebuke of Islam-critical printers. The claim comes from sekulœre politicians who appoints (?) politically correct bishops. It is simply uhyggjeleg.

This is the truth. The day we are not allowed to tell the truth about Islam in Norway, then the Norwegian people submit to one of Islam's most important requirements.

The Koran demands the killing of those who do not submit to "Allah" and skriftstru Islamic barns, is not something our country plan to educate readers about.

Here is one of the stanzas which calls for Holy War:


Sura 5:33 reads:

"Their wage that fight God and His Messenger and move about and staples strife on earth will be that they be killed or crucified, the hands and feet cut off crosswise, or that they be banished from the country. This will be a disgrace in this world. In the Hereafter a heavy punishment awaits. "

Source: AjNorway

If you want to hear more of Hallgrim Berg's criticism of Islam, listen to the audio file of a speech he held at the Pentecostal Movement's pro-Israel conference in Telemark in 2010. Here is the link.

Yttringsfridomen in Norway is now threatened by the Norwegians who do not understand their own best. Hallgrim Berg is a warm defender of human rights, yttringsfridom and democracy. He deserves praise.

Jesus is the most Islam-critic of all.

If he began to argue that Muhammad is a false prophet, would Frelsaren been killed in countries like Iran, Syria, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.

No risk of Jesus being persecuted and imprisoned in Norway, if he would take to tell the truth about Islam.

Since Islam does not acknowledge Jesus as God, all that will follow Jesus tell the truth about this religion.

Jesus is the way, the truth and the life. Islam is a dangerous blindveg.

Written by Ivar Fjeld

Add back a comment »| Persecution, Islam | Mark as: Bible, Islam, Jesus, Christianity, Norway | Direct Link
Posta care of Brothers

.............."

Original version reported in: http://ivarfjeld.wordpress.com/2011/08/13/ivar-fjeld-startar-blogg-pa-norsk/

Original page:
http://ivarskrivar.com/2011/08/12/vart-land-hanar-islam-kritikkar-hallgrim-berg/

Original version:
(*)


.......... . . . . . . . . .
Above image - Luther's rose, seized, conquered emptied and then re-filled with Rome's poison? - URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luther_rose

.......... . . . . . . . . .

Notice the swastika stylized and hidden in the socialist hand-with-rose. I've no doubt that the Roman Catholic operation of using the Luther's rose, started with the "Rosi Crucian" sect (Rosi Crucian, R and C,.... Roman Catholic) and is aimed to re-found Lutheranism on the anti-Jewish booklet of doc Martin Luther, destroying ideologically and theologically the immense importance of the 95 Thesis:



Thursday, July 28, 2011

The enemy in the mirror (apparently enemies....)


user posted image



Legend for the above three images: 1) Are the knights a reflex of Klingsor,... or Klingsor is a reflex of the knights?
2) Council of Trent's fist gripping the rose, (a classical): penetrate Lutheranism, depredate its social doctrine, use it like a dead skin and fill it with the ideology of the Counter Reformation
3) The passion of Christ, represented by the old black cross inside the rose, has been deleted and substituted by the Black Haken Kreuz inside the fist. In other words: Jesuitism re-founding Lutheranism.






Spectacular fireworks at 22.11 hours






Saturday, August 06, 2011

Gaza is the today's WDG version of the Spain 1936/37 training war


------------------------------------------------
Note: the swastika

Swastika

The symbol of the 4-sided swastika is an archetype for the rotations of time and conscousness - moving clockwise and counterwise - in upward or downward spirals - allowing souls to experience many levels of reality simultaneously.

The word Swastika comes from the Sanskrit words su, meaning well, and asti, meaning to be.

The swastika is an equilateral cross with its arms bent at right angles either clockwise or anticlockwise. It is traditionally oriented so that a main line is horizontal, though it is occasionally rotated at forty-five degrees, and the Hindu version often has a dot in each quadrant.

The swastika has not always been used as a symbol of Nazism and was in fact borrowed from Eastern cultures. It seems to have first been used by early inhabitants of Eurasia. It is an important symbol in Eastern religions, notably Hinduism and Buddhism, among others, and was also used in Native American faiths before World War II. By the early twentieth century it was regarded worldwide as a symbol of good luck and auspiciousness. Swastikas appeared on the spines of books by the Anglo-Indian writer Rudyard Kipling, and the symbol was used by Robert Baden-Powell's Boy Scout movement.

Since the rise of the National Socialist German Workers Party, the swastika has been associated with fascism, racism, World War II, and the Holocaust in much of the western world. Before this, it was particularly well-recognized in Europe from the archaeological work of Heinrich Schliemann, who discovered the symbol in the site of ancient Troy and who associated it with the ancient migrations of Indo-European (Aryan) peoples. Nazi use derived from earlier German völkisch nationalist movements, for which the swastika was a symbol of "Aryan" identity, a concept that came to be equated by theorists like Alfred Rosenberg with a Nordic master race originating in northern Europe. The swastika remains a core symbol of Neo-Nazi groups.

Since the end of World War II, the traditional uses of swastika in the western world were discouraged. Many innocent people or products were wrongly persecuted. There have been failed attempts by individuals and groups to educate Westerners to look past the swastika's recent association with the Nazis to its prehistoric origins.

Alternative historical English spellings of the Sanskrit word include suastika and svastica.

Source: http://www.crystalinks.com/swastika.html


.......... . . . . . . . . .

(*) Original version:

Vårt Land sår tvil omkring Islam-kritikkar Hallgrim Berg

“Hallgrim Berg angrer ingenting”.

Halgrim Berg vert mistenkjeleggjort av Vårt Land for å ha vore kritisk til Islam.

“Hallgrim Berg angrer ingenting”.

Dette er tittelen på ein artikkel i Vårt Land.

Avisa prøver å kaste eit uheldig lys over Berg, og vil at lesarane skal tenkje at den tidlegare stortingsmannen har same ideologiske syn som Anders Behring Breivik.

Dette høver seg ikkje for ei avis som hevdar å vœre kristen.

Det verkar som motivet er at dei som åtvarar mot Islam som religion og ideologi, skal bringast til tystnad. Det er akkurat dette som er målet med Sharia lovene i land som Iran og Saudi Arabia.

Slik sett vert “Islam-kritikkar” Anders Behring Breivik Islam sin beste ven i Norge, når han tyr til terror mot AUF. Dette grusome overgrepet slår no tilbake på alle former for lovlege ytringar om Islam.

Kva er det som får ei avis som Vårt Land til å så tvil om Høgre-mannen Hallgrim Berg?

Vårt Land mottok 37 millioner kroner i statstøtte i 2010. Avisa er det viktigste talerøret for den norske kyrkja i media.

Opplaget til Vårt land er omlag 24.000. Avisa får litt over 1500 kroner i årleg støtte frå den sekulœre Staten for kvar daglege kjøpar av avisa.

Vårt Land er ikkje åleine, om å eksistere på nåde av den norske staten. Andre kristne aviser i Norge må passe seg, så dei ikkje blir organ for statsreligionen i Norge, ein utvatna falsk versjon av det Martin Luther ein gong lœrte.

Den uavhengige kristne dagsavisa “Dagen” mottar 13 millionar i statsstøtte.

Pinsebevegelsen si vekeavis “Korsets Seier” mottok 1,8 millioner kroner i statsstøtte. Det er det ikkje mange Pinsevenner i Norge som er klar over.

Den Israel-venlege, og Islam-kritiske vekeavisa “Norge i Dag” mista statsstøtta.

Det er farleg å hamne i lomma på den sekulœre etterkristne staten. Det er ikkje lett for redaktørar å stå i mot, når det kjem politiske føringar i form av “oppmodingar” om å ta eit oppgjer med det som ikkje er politisk korrekt.

Vårt-Land sitt angrep på Hallgrim Berg er eit døme på dette. Å kritisere Islam, blir av den Arbeiderparti kontrollerte statsmakta sett på som eit angrep på det fleirkonturelle Norge.

Dette er ei kortslutning. Islam vil aldri støtte eit fleirkulturelt Norge som politisk mål. I alle land der Muslimane har kome i fleirtal, har yttringsfridom og demokrati blitt avskaffa. Islam vert innført som statsreligion, og berre Muslimar har rett til å styre.

Også den Arbeiderparti styrte statskyrkja vil ha refs av Islam-kritikkarar. Kravet kjem frå sekulœre politikarar som utnemner politisk korrekte biskopar. Det er rett og slett uhyggjeleg.

Dette er sanninga. Den dagen vi ikkje har lov å seie sanninga om Islam i Norge, så har det norske folk underkasta seg eit av Islam sine viktigste krav.

At Koranen krav drap av dei som ikkje underkastar seg “allah” og skriftstru Islamsk lœre, er ikkje noko Vårt Land har tenkt å opplyse lesarane om.

Her er eit av versa som oppfordrar til Heilag krig:

Sure 5 33 lyder:

” Deres lønn som bekjemper Gud og Hans sendebud og farter omkring og stifter ufred på jorden, skal være at de drepes eller korsfestes, at hender og føtter avhugges kryssvis, eller at de forvises fra landet. Dette vil være en skam i denne verden. I det hinsidige venter en svær straff.”

Kjelde: AjNorway

Dersom du vil høyre meir av Hallgrim Berg sin kritikk av Islam, lytt til lydfila av ei tale han held på Pinserørsla sitt Israel-stevne i Telemark i 2010. Her er linken.

Yttringsfridomen i Norge er no truga av nordmenn som ikkje forstår sitt eige beste. Hallgrim Berg er ein varm forsvarar av menneskerettar, yttringsfridom og demokrati. Han fortener ros.

Jesus er den største Islam-kritikaren av alle.

Dersom han tok til å hevde at Muhammed er ein falsk profet, ville Frelsaren blitt drepen i land som Iran, Syria, Pakistan og Saudi Arabia.

No risikerer Jesus å bli forfulgt og fengsla også i Norge, om Han skulle ta til å seie sanninga om Islam.

Sidan Islam ikkje anerkjenner Jesus som Gud, må alle som vil følgje Jesus tale sant om denne religionen.

Jesus er vegen, sanninga og livet. Islam er ein farleg blindveg.

Skriven av Ivar Fjeld

----------------------------------------
13 Aug 2011 - Elaborated and corrected the text some hours after the publishing, added the Luther's rose and added at the top the phrase "The Israel-friendly, and Islam-critical...etc.", and some precisation about the initials of R-osi C-rucian representing simply R-oman C-atholicism.
------------------------------------------------
(As I have no time, no resources, no money, no support at disposition, it is clear that what I wrote is affected by many errors and uncorrectness. I am not a prostitute lay journalist of this dirty Vatican 'tollerant' regime called 'democracy'. I have not the 51% of the Bank of America supporting my writings. I don't control the Casinò of Ostenda and neither Citroen and Peugeot as the General Superior did at least in 1958. So corrections and additions could appear in the future)