Friday, February 5, 2010

Who Killed the Empire?

28 Zweischwerterlehre. Gott verleiht dem Papst und dem Kaiser ein Schwert. Der Kaiser hält dem Papst die Steigbügel (1295/ij6j, Dresdner Bilderhandschrift des Sachsenspiegels)

The most important changing of the strategic deployment on the field leading to the destruction of both German and Austrian bloodlines in the first conflict, was the sudden betrayal of Italy to the Triple Alliance pact which was signed by Italy, Austria and Germany.

After the alliance of forty-five years before, with the Prussian ally, during the war that led to the capture of Rome, Italy betrayed the core of the old ally allowing so the end of the "Central empire" system.

All that today continue to be presented in some historical versions as the defeat of right arm of the Vatican, identifying the defeat of the central empires with only the end of a reigning Roman Catholic bloodline and avoiding to underline that also the most powerful Protestant bloodline in the continent and perhaps in the world was liquidated at the end of that conflict.

The role of Roman Catholic and with Masonic-costume-dressed Italian country was to supply Protestant Prussia with a false friend who, at the hour X, would have turned his back to the ally. The hour X came and it struck on the 3rd August 1914. In that day it started the catastrophe for the entire German world, whose unity was feared by Rome not less than a rat fear an hungry cat.

When the smokes of the war started to disappear, the great British empire had free hand in the Atlantic Ocean and a competitor less in the Mediterranean sea. And the heretic lands North to the Alps were finally deprived by a valid defender against the revenge of Rome. If this is not an agreement, I don't know the human word to correctly term that and I don't think I'll ask for it to Edmund Paris.

Remember that the true explosive mix able to disintegrate the thirsty of power of the Vatican in the world was not the Royal fleet of an Anglican crown without power of interference in the inner life of the Vatican theocratic monarchy. The true explosive was originated by the assonance of two tremendous nightmares. One was the old imperial privilege - inherited by the Hapsburg bloodline - to interfere in the appointment of every pope. It was something more important than the usual veto granted to all the Roman Catholic dynasties in the elections of the new pope. It was a real “imprimatur” or consent. The second nightmare of course was the Lutheran essence of Protestant Prussia. The joining and the assonance of both nightmares would have meant for the Vatican the materialization of such an indescribable horror like the one represented by a Lutheran super-power able to put vetoes on any election of a pope through imperial privileges...

You think that's nothing?

Austria and Prussia were lucky because at those times Einstein and Oppenheimer were only well knit student of physic and especially not Vatican citizens. Because Rome would have had any doubt about a preventive nuclear strike on Wien and Berlin to push away the Mother of all the Nightmares.

But the usual Jesuit Machiavellism (with annexed opportunistic false suicides of sons and heirs of Emperors?) which intensely operated in the Vatican presided Austria, resulted unsuccessful, hence Rome launched her H-bomb “First World Conflict” whose theological fallout killed immediately any imperial privilege and any Lutheran bloodline.

It is revealing the strange absence of considerations on this aspect of that European reality, a silence well disguised by the noise of the fashion of the moment, which tends to identify in a too much hasty (to avoid suspects) judgment the defeat of a Roman Catholic imperial bloodline – Hapsburg - as it was a deadly hit to Rome the same. But Rome the same – I can imagine it – can be very generous and pay with a tacit opportunist agreement those 'heretics' who, apparently, are attacking her, but are silent about her the most terrible nightmares.


Archduchess Regina von Habsburg, who died on February 3 aged 85, was the wife of Dr Otto von Habsburg – formerly Crown Prince of the Austro-Hungarian Empire and latterly a highly respected member of the European parliament; had history taken a different turn, she would have been Empress of Austria and Queen of Hungary.

Archduchess Regina von Habsburg

The Archduchess with her husband, Dr Otto von Habsburg, at a mass to mark their 50th wedding anniversary in 2001
Photo: EPA

Christened Regina Helene Elisabeth Margarete, she was born in Würzburg, Germany, on January 6 1925, the youngest of four daughters of Prince Georg, the titular Duke Georg III of Saxe-Meiningen, and his wife, Countess Klara-Marie von Korff genannt Schmissing-Kerssenbrock. Her father, who had joined the Nazi party in 1933, died in a Russian prisoner-of-war camp at Chernopevetz a year after the war ended, when she was 21. Her sister died at only three months old, while one of her brothers, Prince Anton Ulrich, was killed in action at Albert-sur-Somme in 1940. Another became a Carthusian monk at Grande Chartreuse in Grenoble.

Further back, her great-grandfather was Georg II, Duke of Saxe-Meiningen (1826-1914), who after the Franco-Prussian War became a well-known patron of the theatre, and is sometimes described as having been the first modern stage director – he is remembered particularly for developing the Meiningen Ensemble, using his court theatre and designing costumes and props himself.


Leo XIII, pope from 1878 to 1903

Rudolf, Kronprinz von Österreich-Ungarn (* 21. August 1858 auf Schloss Laxenburg; † 30. Jänner 1889 auf Schloss Mayerling)

1919 / Versailles, Frankreich Gruppenaufnahme der Teilnehmer der Friedenskonferenz von Versailles (1. Reihe von rechts): Woodrow Wilson (USA), George Clemenceau (Frankreich), David Lloyd George (England) und Naron Sonnino (Italien).

Corrections - 08th Feb 2010: instead to read ".. were finally deprived by a valid defender against the hungry of Rome...." read: "..... were finally deprived by a valid defender against the revenge of Rome.......". Please, respect the roles.
(As I have no time, no resources, no money, no support at disposition, it is clear that what I wrote is affected by many errors and uncorrectness. I am not a prostitute lay journalist of this dirty Vatican 'tollerant' regime called 'democracy'. I have not the 51% of the Bank of America supporting my writings. I don't control the Casinò of Ostenda and neither Citroen and Peugeot as the General Superior did at least in 1958. So corrections and additions could appear in the future)

No comments:

Post a Comment