Friday, September 12, 2014

"Disguised themselves as rebels".

  Above imag
Saturday, August 30, 2014
PUTIN - PAVELIC - STEPINAC: three men - one star?

19 April, 12:15

NATOs next Secretary General Stoltenberg is responsible person - President Putin

  Sunday, April 27, 2014
The 'Warsaw' Pact died. Who will substitute him? N.A.T.O.

       Nothing changed since Stalin. Same murderous perversion by Russian elite, same blasphemous supporting to them by the Western elite. Eastern and Western Roman Catholic empires. The end of 1054 Schism tomorrow, 13th September also rembered 20 kilometres from my home, also blessed with the eternal blood of the innocents. What is happening today in the secessionist "republic" of Ukraine is only a deja vu:

"............ On Sokolov’s preeminent role leading Soviet
disguised as
underground anti-Soviet partisans in the postwar suppression of anti-Soviet rebels in Lithuania,

see: Juozas Daumantas [alias for Juozas Luksa],
Fighters for freedom: Lithuanian partisans
versus the USSR (1944-1947)
(Toronto: The Lithuanian Canadian Committee for Human
Rights, 1975), 2nd ed.: 81-82; and K. V. Tauras,
Guerilla warfare on the amber coast
York: Voyager Press, 1962): 78-80. Also see top secret communiqué from Deputy MVD V.
Riasnoi to Lithuanian MVD Major-General Vartashunas in Vilnius, 29 June 1946. GARF, f. R-
9478, op. 1, d. 527, l. 27.

"There are no better illustrations of the Soviet use of rape as a tactical weapon in
warfare than those found in the records of Soviet spetsgruppy in West Ukraine:
evidently, special MGB maskirovka units regularly brutalized local Ukrainian
women while disguised as rebels.
Here is just one of myriad examples found in
Soviet police files:
“On the night of 23 July 1948 the same spetsgruppa [masquerading as rebel
bandits] from Podvysots´ke village abducted in the forest a young woman
REPNYTSKA Nina Iakovlevna, born in 1931.
In the forest REPNYTSKA was subjected to tortures.
While interrogating REPNYTSKA, members of the spetsgruppa beat her
severely, hung her upside down by her legs, forced a stick into her genitalia, and
then one by one raped her.
In a helpless condition, REPNYTSKA was abandoned in the forest, where
her husband found her and took her to the hospital, where REPNYTSKA spent
an extended period recovering.”118
The logic? Following officially sanctioned procedures, Soviet policemen disguised
themselves as rebels, then perpetrated atrocities in their name, hoping in this way to
provoke distrust and antagonism between rebel units and the local population.
this context, gender violence was not an end in itself, but a tactical weapon that
utilized women’s bodies to fight a wider conflict."

Whether they were rapists in Soviet uniforms, petty officials in the local
apparatus, or even members of Soviet spetsgruppy perpetrating acts of gender
violence under orders, Soviet authorities did themselves play a critical role in the
creation of an image of the enemy other that included not just Ukrainian men, but
also Ukrainian women and children. The logic of Soviet institution building
dictated a definition of the Ukrainian enemy that would justify violence against
young and old, male and female. At a meeting of thirty-five Soviet Party, MGB,
and MVD officers in West Ukraine with then General Secretary Lazar´
Kaganovich, Nikita Khrushchev, and Ukrainian Minister of State Security
S. R. Savchenko in L´viv on 23 April 1947, the Drohobych obkom secretary
Gorobets noted that 60% of all locals sentenced for Ukrainian nationalism in 1946

had been women and girls, even as only 8% of the local UPA rank-and-file were
female.119 Stanyslaviv obkom secretary M. Slon´ explained the reasoning for the
disproportionate focus on Ukrainian women and children:We must repress family
as traitors against the nation
. We must deport families of rebels as
dangerous threats to state security.”120 The logic of the mass arrests and mass
deportations was to punish not just the rebels, but also their families, friends, and
loved ones, all who fell into Soviet punitive traps as “collaborators” with the
organized anti-Soviet opposition. Add to this the practical issue: while male rebels
often managed to elude Soviet capture, their wives, mothers, daughters, cousins,
and neighbors were readily available for retaliation delivered at the hands of
frustrated Stalinist policemen."....
  •  "......  On July 14, 2009, leading Russian human rights journalist and activist Natalia Estemirova (pictured, left), a single mother of a teenaged daughter, was abducted in front of her home in Grozny, Chechnya, spirited across the border into Ingushetia, shot and dumped in a roadside gutter. Viewed as the successor to Anna Politkovskaya and by far the most prominent living critic of Chechen strongman Ramzan Kadyrov, who had repeatedly threatened her life, Estemirova was a member of the “Memorial” human rights NGO and a steadfast defender of human rights in Chechnya.  Most recently, she had been reporting on the barbaric practice of the government in burning down the homes of rebel activists, often with women and children locked inside....."
 The Putin Murders
A Brief History of Putintime

 by Douglas Willinger:

Thursday, September 11, 2014

Western-Eastern Roman Empire 101


...and reported in a C. Stiliyanov's post:
  "+ Valeryi Philipenko In eastern Ukraine, Orthodox soldiers who are struggling with evil spirits Baptist, located in Kiev!

Baptists = Protestants and Protestants after the Inquisition burned thousands of "witches" and "wizards". If you map all (written, officially known) places burnings, the majority of them will be in Switzerland and Germany, part of France, part of Spain, and very few in Italy. These comrades - the founders of Protestantism, Calvin, Luther, etc., is prohibited colored (!) Clothing, jewelry - any, festivities for the holidays, except for church singing, except the church paintings, books other than the Bible, shorter THIS IS TALIBAN Christianity."
събота, 19 юли 2014 г. Guilty by association - Are you a part of a SECT[CULT]? (pt 8)


Thursday, March 6, 2014
Andrij Mendierej killed in UKRAINEAN hospital [Video]

"....With tens of thousands of people living there, Smolensk was probably the largest city in 15th-century Lithuania. Three Smolensk regiments proved decisive during the Battle of Grunwald against the Teutonic Knights. It was a severe blow to Lithuania when the city was taken by Vasily III of Russia in 1514. To commemorate this event, the Tsar founded the Novodevichy Convent in Moscow and dedicated it to the icon of Our Lady of Smolensk...."
  Monday, March 17, 2014
Our Lady of Smolensk 2010 Crash

Tuesday, September 2, 2014

"From the face of the serpent" 

Saturday, June 7, 2014

13th September, Jesuit pope near Trieste to launch a message on the RED LINE.



Is this one the hidden message of the coming pilgrimage and prayer of the Jesuit pope? 

-----> "Don't try to change the religious map of Europe, or you'll find us disposed to slaughter you no more or less we slaughtered millions of people from 1914 to 1945 to reach our Counter Reformation goals".

"...The Pope will visit Redipuglia: September 13th event
By the Pope in person the official announcement and surprise: he will pray in the military shrine to the fallen of the Great War

Official announcement from the Vatican. Francis Pope will visit the Shrine of military monumental cemetery of  Redipuglia. The event is set for September 13th.

It was the Pope himself to reveal his plans: in a meeting with a delegation of the Carabinieri, Bergoglio said: "On September 13, I'll go to pilgrimage to the shrine of military cemetery opf Redipuglia to pray for the fallen of all wars." He added: "The occasion was the centenary of the beginning of the huge tragedy that was the First World War» Etc. Etc.

       What is the monumental cemetery, the shrine of Redipuglia? Just only 25 kilometres from my home......:

 "....The military memorial Redipuglia is a monumental military cemetery located in Friuli Venezia Giulia, built during the fascist era [1] and dedicated to the memory of more than 100,000 Italian soldiers died during the First World War. It is located within the municipal area of ​​Fogliano Redipuglia in the province of Gorizia (Friuli-Venezia Giulia). The huge size and the wide area involved in memory of the park make it the largest military memorial in Italy and one of the largest in the world. Every 4 November in the presence of the President of the Senate, acting for the President of the Republic engaged in contemporary celebrations similar to the Altar of the Fatherland, the shrine serves as a place of commemoration for all 689,000 soldiers died during the First World War. The monument is the centerpiece of a memorial park of over 100 hectares, which includes parts of the Carso theater during the Great War of harsh battles.The grand staircase of stone that forms the shrine Redipuglia is positioned directly in front of the hill of St. Elias, the former headquarters of the cemetery of war whose remains were moved to the current monumental shrine. The whole area was converted to a park of "memory" or "remembrance": tunnels, trenches, craters, unexploded ammunition and machine gun nests were stored on the site in memory of the war
 The memorial monument was designed by a working group chaired by the architect Giovanni Greppi and the sculptor Giannino Castiglioni. Work began in 1935 with a massive use of men and means that after 3 years of uninterrupted work allowed the inauguration of the monument September 18, 1938 in the presence of Mussolini and more than 50,000 veterans of the Great War. [2] The monument from birth until 1998, was administered by the Ministry of Defense, which has been responsible for maintaining and in 1999 came under the administration of the Province of Gorizia. [3]

Military cemetery or the shrine of Redipuglia, is located inside the lower part of the blue area, a little west and north to the town of Monfalcone; if you move the red line from Trieste westward approx. near the location of the shrine of Redipuglia, you reach the east part of BERLIN (meanwhile the actual line reaches the east sands of Berlin as described by cardinal Wiseman; see the link below the picture):

Monday, April 16, 2012

13° 48' 15'' - 13° 24' [from Trieste to the sands of the mark of Brandenburg]

Wednesday, July 24, 2013

A portrait in Tyrol


Above images - top: the cover of the book "Geschichte der Kirche in Tirol" by Josef Gelmi, publishing house Athesia. Below: at page 364 there's the image of a picture in a Tyrolean church. Caption: "Three Roman soldiers playing dice [to get] the dress of Christ, the heads of the soldiers are carrying portraits. The central figure is to be identified as prince chancellor of the reign Otto von Bismarck. Picture in the church of the Vinzentinums at Brixen (an excerpt) by painter A. Steiner von Felsburg."

"....Stoecker continued to draw significant crowds because of his Christian Social Gospel and Jewish Question sermons and speeches, remaining an influential figure both in the socialist movement and the growing anti-Semitic movement. Stoecker died on February 2, 1909 in Bozen Gries (German pronunciation: [ˈboːtsən griːəs]), South Tyrol, Austria-Hungary.....".


Tuesday, April 5, 2011

1862: a trip in Vatican

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Lybian war used to put enmity between Turkey, Germany and Austria?


Antonino Paternò Castello, marchese di San Giuliano:

Above image -  ".....Antonino Paternò-Castello, sixth Marquis di San Giuliano (known as Antonino di San Giuliano, Catania, December 10, 1852 - Rome, 16 October 1914) was an Italian politician and diplomat.

After being Postmaster General in 1899, 1905-1906 and 1910-1914 he was Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of Italy.

Liberal and anticlerical, in 1906 he directed the Italian politics to the Conference of Algeciras giving it autonomy from all'alleata Germany. Later he was sent as ambassador to London and Paris (1906-1910).

Started his second term for Foreign Affairs (1910), followed by Italy, which exploited the Agadir Crisis to begin the conflict with Turkey. After early successes of the Italian army in Libya he was unable to make a simple protectorate for the decision of the Prime Minister Giovanni Giolitti to implement a complete conquest and annexation. Prolungatosi therefore the conflict, handled the difficult position of Italy towards Europe.

He led the negotiations for the renewal of the Triple Alliance of 1912 and managed the development of the Balkan wars in Italy, with particular attention to Albania of which supported the strategic importance for the control of the Adriatic.

Although proponent of the Triple Alliance, the outbreak of World War I began negotiations approaching the Triple Entente. These contacts lead then, with his successors at Foreign Affairs , to the signing of the Treaty of London and the subsequent descent into the war against Austria in 1915.

After the ultimatum of 28 September 1911 and the landing of troops on the Italian coast of Libya, with the passing of weeks, thanks to German mediation, San Giuliano showed himself willing to negotiations that would have formally left Libya to Turkey, and that they would be granted to 'Italy a protectorate of political-economic [30]. For an alternative view was that instead Giolitti claim full employment of the territory in order to establish any form of domination had wanted to Italy. [31]Forced to revise its plans in terms of annexation and extension of the conflict, the Marquis found himself in trouble with the Allies, who were very close to Turkey: Germany didn't guarantee its mediation in Constantinople [32] and the 'Italy Austria forced not to take action against targets Turkish Italian ships in the Adriatic and Ionian Seas. [33] In France, mounted the protests, which resulted in a diplomatic crisis with Italy January 22, 1912, following a speech to the House of President Poincare [34].The interpretation of Article 7With Austria then began a long and delicate negotiations for the Turkish occupation of the islands of the Aegean, coveted by Italy as a basis to stop the flow of supplies to the Turkish Libyan ports. The Austrian Foreign Minister Alois Lexa von Aehrenthal opposed to such employment by invoking Article 7 of the Triple Alliance, which obliged the power (in Italy or Austria), which expanded in the Balkans and the Aegean to agree with each other to lavish upon her remuneration from [35].Taking advantage of the ongoing negotiations for the renewal of the covenant, San Giuliano parried by the Vienna common understanding ally, Berlin, that the occupations in the Aegean were essential to end the war in Libya, remaining which would have ended the Triple Alliance because Italy would not have renewed it. [36]Meanwhile, the Austrian Foreign Minister Aehrenthal has been succeeded by Leopold Berchtold who was  malleable and, influenced by Germany, on April 6, 1912 showed an opening respect Italy, and 26, the [Italian]  Navy was able to proceed with the landing operations on the first island to be conquered: Stampalia..........".

Wikipedia - URL:,_marchese_di_San_Giuliano

    Plese note the above coincidences of the days and of the nations: both Germany and Italy attacked Yugoslavia without declaration of war in 1941, on 6th April.

Count Leopold Berchtold:


   Above image - "...Leopold (Anton Johann Sigismund Josef Korsinus Ferdinand) Graf Berchtold von und zu Ungarschitz, Frättling und Püllütz (Hungarian: Gróf Berchtold Lipót, Czech: Leopold hrabě Berchtold z Uherčic) (18 April 1863 – 21 November 1942), was an Austro-Hungarian[1] politician, diplomat and statesman who served as Imperial Foreign Minister at the outbreak of World War I.
        .........At the outset of the Balkan Wars, Count Berchtold pursued a hard-line policy and flirted with the idea of war against Serbia, but vacillated and pulled back from intervention at the last moment.[7] Although he managed to prevent Serbia from securing an outlet to the Adriatic Sea with the creation of Albania, the Balkan Wars resulted in a failure to contain the rising Russian influence in the Balkans and thwart Serbian ambitions for a South Slav state.[8] It meant diplomatic defeat for Austria-Hungary and also a reputation of being weak and indecisive for Count Berchtold
        After having dispatched Count Hoyos on a mission to Berlin on 5 July to secure German support for Austria-Hungary's future actions, which resulted in the famous ' blank cheque ', he became the leading spokesman, together with the Chief of the General Staff General Conrad von Hötzendorf, for war against Serbia during the meeting of the imperial Crown Council on 7 July.
        However, Italian Foreign Minister Baron Sonnino succeeded in obtaining vague promises of compensations in South Tyrol from Germany and by the end of 1914, Count Berchtold informed the Crown Council that the choice was either acceptance of the Italian demands or a declaration of war. Both Count Tisza and General Conrad von Hötzendorf expressed a preference for the latter.[16] Under mounting German pressure, Count Berchtold, however, indicated that he was ready to cede the Trentino and parts of the Albanian coastline. When he informed Count Tisza and General Conrad von Hötzendorf of the concessions he was ready to give, they forced him to resign on 13 January 1915.[17] At Count Tisza’s insistence he was replaced by the more pugnacious Count Burián......"
        Wikipedia - URL:

Friday, June 28, 2013

28 JUNE 1914 - Berlin-Baghdad Railway is dead.

Friday, June 28, 2013

28 JUNE 1914 - Berlin-Baghdad Railway is dead.


I cannot do a post as usual. The Swines don’t allow to me to access to the addresses necessary to write this article. What did I have intention to do?


Well, the article you could read and will never read would be opened by a video, a short video of my little railroad layout. [If you want to see it please go to the address: 
title: “Museumszug in Nowhereland – I”].

This would be intro, I am railroad modeller fanatic, especially German Austrian of age from I to early III. The train would have introduced the argument especially because is a steam train, with passengers cars of early XX century in the administration of early twenties. The steam loco is a Prussian one used to push heavy trains on mountains lines, lines like the ones through the…..: BALKANS.

Then I would have putted the picture of the assassinated archduke ranz Ferdinand of Austria, he was in fact assassinated in the BALKANS, precisely Sarajevo.

Then I would have presented the core of the article, the Wikipedia page on the causes of the First World Conflict, the….:

Berlin-Baghdad Railway

I would have explained how the usual historical explanations are tricks to avoid the true cause of the first conflict. This project of railway would have signed for ever the unity of the Catholic Austria with Protestant Prussia, with a predominance of Protestant Prussia. It would have signed the definitive denial by the Hapsburgs to the orders of the Jesuits and Vatican to fight to death the Northern ‘heretics’, the German cousins of Berlin. Super-Catholics Hapsburg would have said the farewell to the dream of Counter Reformation of the Jesuits as the perspective of a joining of forces of both German opposite worlds in the Balkans would have gained more profits and development for both Austria and Prussia than a fratricidal war in the name of the “principles of the papacy”. Then they would joined the Ottoman empire carrying there dangerous liberal ‘infection’.

I then would have ended repeating what I just told. Hapsburg, being a Catholic dynasty, had the right to interfere  with the elections of the popes in Vatican and this is “anathema” for the papal infallibility ordered by the evil Jesuits. I would have remarked that this is one of the principal causes of the disappearing of the Catholic dynasties, to avoid secular ingerences in Vatican which would have kicked the Jesuits.

Then I would have remarked what just told year ago, that Hapsburg being successor of the emperors, enjoyed a greater privilege on the papacy than the usual one enjoyed by usual Catholic dynasties. They had the RIGHT OF IMPRIMATUR to every new pope, just see the Barbarossa’s etc. history.

Therefore that railroad represented the end of the Vatican and of the Jesuits, therefore they had to gather the opposite economical interests in the world in order to create a war based on economical presumptions but with a religious goal.

I would have ended the article with the second video “Museumszug in Nowhereland – II” at URL:

Thursday, April 11, 2013

"Jewish Question" and National-Socialism as Big Jesuit Scheme born in XVII century?


 ".....Greatly influenced by the Jesuits, he [Leopold I, holy Roman emperor] was a staunch proponent of the Counter-reformation.......".

*   *   *




    After an exchange of thoughts with nwo-truthresearch blog author, I reflected on the matter and did some research, some ideas of mine seem to be perfectly confirmed - Leopold I (un)holy emperor, the Jesuits and the "Jewish Question" here:

From: Leopold I, Holy Roman Emperor  
 by Wikipedia 

Leopold I (name in full: Leopold Ignaz Joseph Balthasar Felician; Hungarian: I. Lipót; 9 June 1640 – 5 May 1705) was Holy Roman Emperor, King of Hungary and King of Bohemia.
The second son of Ferdinand III, Holy Roman Emperor by his first wife, Maria Anna of Spain, Leopold became heir apparent in 1654 by the death of his elder brother Ferdinand IV. Elected Holy Roman Emperor in 1658, Leopold would rule as such until his death in 1705.
Originally intended for the Church, Leopold had received a suitably ecclesiastical education. But Fate put in motion a different plan for him when smallpox took his elder brother Ferdinand on 9 July 1654 and made Leopold heir apparent.[2] Nonetheless, Leopold's church education had clearly marked him. Leopold remained influenced by the Jesuits and his education throughout his life, and was uncommonly knowledgeable for a monarch about theology, metaphysics, jurisprudence and the sciences. He also retained his interest in astrology and alchemy which he had developed under Jesuit tutors.[2] A deeply religious and devoted person, Leopold personified the pietas Austriaca, or the loyally Catholic attitude of his House. On the other hand, his piety and education may have caused in him a fatalistic strain which inclined him to reject all compromise on denominational questions, not always a positive characteristic in a ruler.
In 1690, Transylvania put a veto against a constitutional amendment, attempted by Leopold, about some religious questions.[11] In 1692, Peter the Great became a little bit sorry that he only met Jesuits at the court in Vienna, when he visited Leopold.[12] In 1692, Prince Michael of Transylvania was called to Vienna, because of a dispute over his recent marriage.
Leopold was a man of industry and education, and during his later years, he showed some political ability. Regarding himself as an absolute sovereign, he was extremely tenacious of his rights. Greatly influenced by the Jesuits, he was a staunch proponent of the Counter-reformation. In person, he was short, but strong and healthy. Although he had no inclination for a military life, he loved exercise in the open air, such as hunting and riding; he also had a taste for music and composed several Oratorios and Suites of Dances.
 "..........The reestablishment of the Jewish community in 1671

Today's Jewish community dates back to 1671, when several Jewish families came to Berlin. They were expelled in 1670 by Leopold I in Vienna. Since Brandenburg daniederlag after the Thirty Years War, the Great Elector Friedrich Wilhelm sought to immigrants into the country to contribute to its reconstruction. In addition to the Huguenots, who came into the country from 1685, however, he allowed her to much worse conditions on 21 May 1671 also 50 wealthy Jewish families to settle in Brandenburg. The privilege of Frederick William to allow the Jews to settle in the whole marrow and assigned them to the field of trade, the guilds of them remained locked. Besides the usual taxes every Jewish family had to pay an annual nominal fee. Only one child per family was allowed to settle in the marrow; to get a marriage license, had an extra fee to be paid. The nascent Jewish communities were allowed to hire a teacher and a kosher butcher and create a cemetery, but the construction of synagogues was temporarily banned.


    Well, so we have the Great Elector Friederich Wilhelm welcoming the Jews expelled by the Jesuit controlled Leopold I in Vienna. But there's no festival for the Jews coming from Vienna. Yes, they can at least breathe in Berlin and Protestant Prussia, but are subject to heavy boundaries and limitation.


     But it is just in the answer of that "why?" that you can discover the Jesuit perfidy. Great Elector Friederich was forced to limit the liberties of immigrated Jews just to not touch the delicate balance between Lutherans and Calvinists. Just only seven years before he issued the Edict of Tolerance [or else named Edict of Brandenburg] and the Jesuits' answer didn't wait too long: the expulsion of Jews. Do I need to recall to you the Edict of Tolerance? [To be not confused with Edict of Potsdam, which was the answer to the Jesuit persecutions against Huguenots in France issued in 1685]:

"........The Brandenburg Edict was issued in 1664 by Elector Friedrich Wilhelm I and governed relations between the Lutheran and Reformed denominations in the country from the Lords.

     The edict forbade the Lutherans and the Reformed (Calvinist) in
particular theologians, to practice their, public criticism to the teachings of each other faiths from the pulpit .
     The Confessions of the Evangelical Lutheran Church were restricted in their validity concerning the demarcations with the Calvinist doctrine. Effectively so that the validity of the Formula of Concord was lifted.

The edict of the Reformed elector saw a part of the Lutheran theologians at a disadvantage of his own party and made bitter opposition.

 Decisive here is the program of the Heidelberg Reformed David Pareus  with the aim of create a bridge over religious antagonisms between Reformed and Lutherans, to create a common front against the Catholic Church.
....." [in the link below the source and my report of it]

      Well, with fatigue the Great Elector could create a common anti-Roman Catholic front between Lutherans and Calvinists. But for Rome the front had to be destroyed. How to do that? Simple, the Jesuits used the Jews and with this they definitively established the "Jewish Question" and the basis for the centuries later incoming ecumenical ideology named "National Socialism". 

      Jesuits used their Leopold I, probably also mind controlled by the Society of "Jesus". They put in motion their Big Scheme who would have then, after centuries, destroyed Protestant Prussia (formally in 1918, definitively in 1945). They chose to make pressure on the anti-Jewish Achille's heel of the Lutherans. Jewish immigration would have fired the historical religious Lutheran antisemitism and imbued it with new (satanic) life. Calvinism doesn't share the Lutheran super-sessionism, the theological doctrine for which Jews lost the Covenant after Jesus' death on the cross. The more open attitude of the Calvinists towards Jewish immigration would have resuscitated again the Lutheran hostility towards the Protestant brothers, especially after they saw that those Jews coming from Austria were well educated and largely instructed, therefore able to increase the value of the properties of the ones collaborating with them. Of course the natural and religious choice "with whom to collaborate" of the  Jewish refugee from Jesuitical Vienna, was entirely directed to the Calvinist front, cause the conscience about the historical Lutheran anti-Judaism

     Therefore the premises for a new destructive war inside the Protestant front of the most powerful continental enemy of Rome, Protestant Prussia, were all created with that immigration. Leopold I didn't expel Jews "just for a theological hobby", but because he obeyed to the influence of his masterminds, the Jesuits, who cynically used the People of God for their criminal purposes of persecution of both Jews as well of the Christians who refuse to submit to the Antichrist in Rome, the pope!


Thursday, September 6, 2012

The author of 1662 and 1664 EDICT OF TOLERANCE among the ancestors of Ulrich von Hassell

Wednesday, July 25, 2012

140 years after: Continuing Jesuitical Großdeutsche Lösung?

Thursday, March 28, 2013

Mussolini's Jesuitical revenge?


Above image - the general of SJ Pietro Tacchi-Venturi, SJ Wladimir Ledochowsky.

Above image - SJ Pietro Tacchi-Venturi, the Jesuit controller of Mussolini

Above image - Jesuitical Mussolini signing the restoring of Vatican as full Temporal Power.

Mario Tedeschi (Rome, September 9, 1924 - Rome, November 8, 1993) was an Italian journalist and politician.

Above image - Mario Tedeschi, the son of a Fascist of Jewish origin engineer murdered in Africa colonies

He succeeded Leo Longanesi to the direction of the magazine Il Borghese after the death of its founder. He led the magazine in what was perhaps the most successful period editorial. His father, fascist  of Jewish origin and construction engineer at the IACP, after the signing of the Lateran Treaty (1929), tore up the card party, and as punishment he was transferred to the colonies of East Africa to direct the construction of roads. There he died when the yard, defenseless, was attacked by enemy gangs and all Italians were killed......."


     Mario Tedeschi was the director of the post-war Italian radical right wing/Fascist and pro-monarchic publishing house/magazine "Il Borghese" which published the work of Nino lo Bello "The Vatican empire"/"L'Oro del Vaticano":

 Monday, March 25, 2013

Nino Lo Bello's "L'Oro del Vaticano" ["The Gold of the Vatican"]

From page 66 of Nino Lo Bello's The Vatican Empire, in Italian at page 72  in L'Oro del Vaticano (note the finesse of the page number coinciding with the fatidical year for the Jesuits' company, 1872):

".....When the news of the Church-State treaty was finally announced, the local citizenry—as well as the rest of the world—was startled. The Italian public, clearly pleased, accorded Benito Mussolini an overflow of support, which he himself had not perhaps anticipated. He became an idol to Catholic Italy. In thousands of homes, people cut pictures of the Duce from magazines and newspapers and pasted them on kitchen and living room walls. Youths splashed pro-Duce slogans in white paint on any flat surface available. Shovels he had used to inaugurate public projects were prized as relics. Wine glasses from which he had sipped were lovingly placed on shelves by restaurant owners. Young women by the thousands offered their favors to his virility—and let it be said that many of them, in fact, were ushered into the Duce's chambers.
     But if the Lateran Treaty was a major coup for Mussolini, it was to be an even bigger victory for the Vatican. Mussolini, like all his bloodstained predecessors, has gone the way of all flesh, but the Vatican remains. And today the Vatican is solidly entrenched in the
Italian economy

  ".... the increase of the 400 millions of men, who in all the corners of the Earth are looking at Rome, is of interest and a proud even for us who are Italians....”[by Benito Mussolini]

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

" of interest and a proud even for us who are Italians".

".....David Kertzer, in his book The Popes Against the Jews [8] (2001), accuses the Catholic Church have argued, with its anti-Judaism, anti-Semitism of the twentieth century totalitarianism. In particular, reports that in 1882 the "La Civiltà Cattolica" announced with satisfaction the first manifestations of modern anti-Semitic political movements that organized international conferences. Also shows that in 1890 appeared in the same journal three long articles on "Jewish question" in the following years were combined into a 90-page booklet distributed to every where....."

 Tuesday, April 5, 2011

1862: a trip in Vatican

[PS: of course all those Catholic Roman enthusiasm for the Duce after the signature of the Lateran Treaty disappeared few years later, when Mussolini was induced to believe he got charte blanche from the Vatican and in exchange for having restored the Temporal bulwark of the popes he could suppress the Catholic Action because too much riotous respect the directives of the party. But we can consider also this move of Mussolini already existing in the minds of the Jesuits, as the times were  mature to build the inner silent Catholic opposition to the regime, an opposition who would put at work in the scheme of sabotaging the Axis war in Eurasia, and where the best examples were the Russian front and the Yugoslavia. Don't worry if was SJ Sale to 'discover' that already in 1942 elements of the Savoy family plotted to make a quick 'end' to the war [= to change alliance and betray the Nazi-Germany]. But they too have been betrayed by the Vatican and the Jesuits, as Rome needed not of a simple 'defeat' of Germany, but of the total, complete annihilation of the last rests of Protestant Prussia, plus some others religious definitions become famous with the WWII...].